last sync: 2025-Apr-29 17:16:02 UTC

Kubernetes cluster services should only use allowed external IPs

Azure BuiltIn Policy definition

Source Azure Portal
Display name Kubernetes cluster services should only use allowed external IPs
Id d46c275d-1680-448d-b2ec-e495a3b6cc89
Version 5.2.0
Details on versioning
Versioning Versions supported for Versioning: 2
5.2.0
5.1.0
Built-in Versioning [Preview]
Category Kubernetes
Microsoft Learn
Description Use allowed external IPs to avoid the potential attack (CVE-2020-8554) in a Kubernetes cluster. For more information, see https://aka.ms/kubepolicydoc.
Cloud environments AzureCloud = true
AzureUSGovernment = true
AzureChinaCloud = unknown
Available in AzUSGov The Policy is available in AzureUSGovernment cloud. Version: '6.1.0'
Repository: Azure-Policy d46c275d-1680-448d-b2ec-e495a3b6cc89
Mode Microsoft.Kubernetes.Data
Type BuiltIn
Preview False
Deprecated False
Effect Default
Audit
Allowed
audit, Audit, deny, Deny, disabled, Disabled
RBAC role(s) none
Rule aliases none
Rule resource types IF (2)
Compliance
The following 18 compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Kubernetes cluster services should only use allowed external IPs' (d46c275d-1680-448d-b2ec-e495a3b6cc89)
Control Domain Control Name MetadataId Category Title Owner Requirements Description Info Policy#
CIS_Controls_v8.1 10.7 CIS_Controls_v8.1_10.7 CIS Controls v8.1 10.7 Malware Defenses Use behaviour based anti-malware software Shared Use behaviour based anti-malware software To ensure that a generic anti-malware software is not used. 99
CIS_Controls_v8.1 13.1 CIS_Controls_v8.1_13.1 CIS Controls v8.1 13.1 Network Monitoring and Defense Centralize security event alerting Shared 1. Centralize security event alerting across enterprise assets for log correlation and analysis. 2. Best practice implementation requires the use of a SIEM, which includes vendor-defined event correlation alerts. 3.A log analytics platform configured with security-relevant correlation alerts also satisfies this safeguard. To ensure that any security event is immediately alerted enterprise-wide. 101
CIS_Controls_v8.1 13.3 CIS_Controls_v8.1_13.3 CIS Controls v8.1 13.3 Network Monitoring and Defense Deploy a network intrusion detection solution Shared 1. Deploy a network intrusion detection solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate. 2. Example implementations include the use of a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) or equivalent cloud service provider (CSP) service. To enhance the organization's cybersecurity. 99
CIS_Controls_v8.1 18.4 CIS_Controls_v8.1_18.4 CIS Controls v8.1 18.4 Penetration Testing Validate security measures Shared Validate security measures after each penetration test. If deemed necessary, modify rulesets and capabilities to detect the techniques used during testing. To ensure ongoing alignment with evolving threat landscapes and bolstering the overall security posture of the enterprise. 93
CIS_Controls_v8.1 8.11 CIS_Controls_v8.1_8.11 CIS Controls v8.1 8.11 Audit Log Management Conduct audit log reviews Shared 1. Conduct reviews of audit logs to detect anomalies or abnormal events that could indicate a potential threat. 2. Conduct reviews on a weekly, or more frequent, basis. To ensure the integrity of the data in audit logs. 62
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 AC.L2_3.1.3 CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_AC.L2_3.1.3 Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 AC.L2 3.1.3 Access Control Control CUI Flow Shared Control the flow of CUI in accordance with approved authorizations. To regulate the flow of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in accordance with approved authorizations 46
CSA_v4.0.12 DCS_02 CSA_v4.0.12_DCS_02 CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 DCS 02 Datacenter Security Off-Site Transfer Authorization Policy and Procedures Shared n/a Establish, document, approve, communicate, apply, evaluate and maintain policies and procedures for the relocation or transfer of hardware, software, or data/information to an offsite or alternate location. The relocation or transfer request requires the written or cryptographically verifiable authorization. Review and update the policies and procedures at least annually. 45
CSA_v4.0.12 DSP_05 CSA_v4.0.12_DSP_05 CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 DSP 05 Data Security and Privacy Lifecycle Management Data Flow Documentation Shared n/a Create data flow documentation to identify what data is processed, stored or transmitted where. Review data flow documentation at defined intervals, at least annually, and after any change. 57
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 09.ab HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_09.ab HITRUST CSF v11.3 09.ab Monitoring Establish procedures for monitoring use of information processing systems and facilities to check for use and effectiveness of implemented controls. Shared 1. It is to be specified how often audit logs are reviewed, how the reviews are documented, and the specific roles and responsibilities of the personnel conducting the reviews, including the professional certifications or other qualifications required. 2. All relevant legal requirements applicable to its monitoring of authorized access and unauthorized access attempts is to be complied with. Procedures for monitoring use of information processing systems and facilities shall be established to check for use and effectiveness of implemented controls. The results of the monitoring activities shall be reviewed regularly. 113
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 09.w HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_09.w HITRUST CSF v11.3 09.w Exchange of Information Develop and implement policies and procedures, to protect information associated with the interconnection of business information systems. Shared 1. A security baseline is to be documented and implemented for interconnected systems. 2. Other requirements and controls linked to interconnected business systems are to include the separation of operational systems from interconnected system, retention and back-up of information held on the system, and fallback requirements and arrangements. Policies and procedures shall be developed and implemented to protect information associated with the interconnection of business information systems. 45
ISO_IEC_27002_2022 5.14 ISO_IEC_27002_2022_5.14 ISO IEC 27002 2022 5.14 Protection, Preventive Control Information transfer Shared To maintain the security of information transferred within an organization and with any external interested party. Information transfer rules, procedures, or agreements should be in place for all types of transfer facilities within the organization and between the organization and other parties. 46
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 .1.3 NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.1.3 NIST 800-171 R3 3.1.3 Access Control Information Flow Enforcement Shared Information flow control regulates where CUI can transit within a system and between systems (versus who can access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include keeping CUI from being transmitted in the clear to the internet, blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization, restricting requests to the internet that are not from the internal web proxy server, and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content. Organizations commonly use information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of CUI between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on characteristics of the information or the information path. Enforcement occurs in boundary protection devices (e.g., encrypted tunnels, routers, gateways, and firewalls) that use rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or provide a message-filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering and inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement. Transferring information between systems that represent different security domains with different security policies introduces the risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners or stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing information access only), employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows, and implementing trustworthy regrading mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels. Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI within the system and between connected systems. 46
RMiT_v1.0 Appendix_5.5 RMiT_v1.0_Appendix_5.5 RMiT Appendix 5.5 Control Measures on Cybersecurity Control Measures on Cybersecurity - Appendix 5.5 Customer n/a Ensure security controls for server-to-server external network connections include the following: (a) server-to-server authentication such as Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate or user ID and password; (b) use of secure tunnels such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Virtual Private Network (VPN) IPSec; and (c) deploying staging servers with adequate perimeter defences and protection such as firewall, IPS and antivirus. link 2
SOC_2023 A1.1 SOC_2023_A1.1 SOC 2023 A1.1 Additional Criteria for Availability Effectively manage capacity demand and facilitate the implementation of additional capacity as needed. Shared n/a The entity maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives. 111
SOC_2023 CC7.2 SOC_2023_CC7.2 SOC 2023 CC7.2 Systems Operations Maintain robust security measures and ensure operational resilience. Shared n/a The entity monitors system components and the operation of those components for anomalies that are indicative of malicious acts, natural disasters, and errors affecting the entity's ability to meet its objectives; anomalies are analysed to determine whether they represent security events. 167
SOC_2023 CC8.1 SOC_2023_CC8.1 SOC 2023 CC8.1 Change Management Minimise risks, ensure quality, optimise efficiency, and enhance resilience in the face of change. Shared n/a The entity authorizes, designs, develops or acquires, configures, documents, tests, approves, and implements changes to infrastructure, data, software, and procedures to meet its objectives by Managing Changes Throughout the System Life Cycle, authorizing changes, designing and developing changes, documenting all changes, tracking system changes, configuring software's, testing system changes, approving system changes, deploying system changes, identifying and evaluating system changes, creating baseline configurations for IT technologies and providing necessary changes in emergency situations. 147
SOC_2023 PI1.3 SOC_2023_PI1.3 SOC 2023 PI1.3 Additional Criteria for Processing Integrity (Over the provision of services or the production, manufacturing, or distribution of goods) Enhance efficiency, accuracy, and compliance with organizational standards and regulatory requirements with regards to system processing to result in products, services, and reporting to meet the entity’s objectives. Shared n/a The entity implements policies and procedures over system processing to result in products, services, and reporting to meet the entity’s objectives. 50
SWIFT_CSCF_2024 1.1 SWIFT_CSCF_2024_1.1 SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 1.1 Physical and Environmental Security Swift Environment Protection Shared 1. Segmentation between the user's Swift infrastructure and the larger enterprise network reduces the attack surface and has shown to be an effective way to defend against cyber-attacks that commonly involve a compromise of the general enterprise IT environment. 2. Effective segmentation includes network-level separation, access restrictions, and connectivity restrictions. To ensure the protection of the user’s Swift infrastructure from potentially compromised elements of the general IT environment and external environment. 69
Initiatives usage
Initiative DisplayName Initiative Id Initiative Category State Type polSet in AzUSGov
[Preview]: Nexus Compute Cluster Security Baseline 336cb876-5cb8-4795-b9d1-bd9323d3487e Nexus Preview BuiltIn unknown
CIS Controls v8.1 046796ef-e8a7-4398-bbe9-cce970b1a3ae Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
CSA CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 8791506a-dec4-497a-a83f-3abfde37c400 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 a4087154-2edb-4329-b56a-1cc986807f3c Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
HITRUST CSF v11.3 e0d47b75-5d99-442a-9d60-07f2595ab095 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
ISO/IEC 27002 2022 e3030e83-88d5-4f23-8734-6577a2c97a32 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
NIST 800-171 R3 38916c43-6876-4971-a4b1-806aa7e55ccc Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
RMIT Malaysia 97a6d4f1-3bed-4cf4-ac5b-0e444c0408d6 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
SOC 2023 53ad89f5-8542-49e9-ba81-1cbd686e0d52 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 7499005e-df5a-45d9-810f-041cf346678c Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
History
Date/Time (UTC ymd) (i) Change type Change detail
2024-08-09 18:17:47 change Minor (5.1.0 > 5.2.0)
2023-05-01 17:41:52 change Minor (5.0.1 > 5.1.0)
2022-10-21 16:42:13 change Patch (5.0.0 > 5.0.1)
2022-09-19 17:41:40 change Major (4.0.1 > 5.0.0)
2022-06-17 16:31:08 change Patch (4.0.0 > 4.0.1)
2022-05-27 20:20:35 change Major (3.1.0 > 4.0.0)
2022-04-01 20:29:14 change Minor (3.0.2 > 3.1.0)
2021-12-06 22:17:57 change Patch (3.0.1 > 3.0.2)
2021-09-08 15:39:57 change Patch (3.0.0 > 3.0.1)
2021-03-16 16:49:20 change Major, old suffix: preview (2.0.0-preview > 3.0.0)
2021-03-02 15:11:40 change Major, suffix remains equal (1.0.0-preview > 2.0.0-preview)
2021-01-13 16:08:35 add d46c275d-1680-448d-b2ec-e495a3b6cc89
JSON compare
compare mode: version left: version right:
JSON
api-version=2021-06-01
EPAC