compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Geo-redundant storage should be enabled for Storage Accounts' (bf045164-79ba-4215-8f95-f8048dc1780b)
| Control Domain |
Control |
Name |
MetadataId |
Category |
Title |
Owner |
Requirements |
Description |
Info |
Policy# |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
CP-6 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_CP-6 |
FedRAMP High CP-6 |
Contingency Planning |
Alternate Storage Site |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Establishes an alternate storage site including necessary agreements to permit the storage and retrieval of information system backup information; and
b. Ensures that the alternate storage site provides information security safeguards equivalent to that of the primary site.
Supplemental Guidance: Alternate storage sites are sites that are geographically distinct from primary storage sites. An alternate storage site maintains duplicate copies of information and data in the event that the primary storage site is not available. Items covered by alternate storage site agreements include, for example, environmental conditions at alternate sites, access rules, physical and environmental protection requirements, and coordination of delivery/retrieval of backup
media. Alternate storage sites reflect the requirements in contingency plans so that organizations can maintain essential missions/business functions despite disruption, compromise, or failure in organizational information systems. Related controls: CP-2, CP-7, CP-9, CP-10, MP-4.
References: NIST Special Publication 800-34. |
link |
7 |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
CP-6(1) |
FedRAMP_High_R4_CP-6(1) |
FedRAMP High CP-6 (1) |
Contingency Planning |
Separation From Primary Site |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization identifies an alternate storage site that is separated from the primary storage site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats.
Supplemental Guidance: Threats that affect alternate storage sites are typically defined in organizational assessments of risk and include, for example, natural disasters, structural failures, hostile cyber attacks, and errors of omission/commission. Organizations determine what is considered a sufficient degree of separation between primary and alternate storage sites based on the types of threats that are of concern. For one particular type of threat (i.e., hostile cyber attack), the degree of separation between sites is less relevant. Related control: RA-3. |
link |
6 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
CP-6 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_CP-6 |
FedRAMP Moderate CP-6 |
Contingency Planning |
Alternate Storage Site |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Establishes an alternate storage site including necessary agreements to permit the storage and retrieval of information system backup information; and
b. Ensures that the alternate storage site provides information security safeguards equivalent to that of the primary site.
Supplemental Guidance: Alternate storage sites are sites that are geographically distinct from primary storage sites. An alternate storage site maintains duplicate copies of information and data in the event that the primary storage site is not available. Items covered by alternate storage site agreements include, for example, environmental conditions at alternate sites, access rules, physical and environmental protection requirements, and coordination of delivery/retrieval of backup
media. Alternate storage sites reflect the requirements in contingency plans so that organizations can maintain essential missions/business functions despite disruption, compromise, or failure in organizational information systems. Related controls: CP-2, CP-7, CP-9, CP-10, MP-4.
References: NIST Special Publication 800-34. |
link |
7 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
CP-6(1) |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_CP-6(1) |
FedRAMP Moderate CP-6 (1) |
Contingency Planning |
Separation From Primary Site |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization identifies an alternate storage site that is separated from the primary storage site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats.
Supplemental Guidance: Threats that affect alternate storage sites are typically defined in organizational assessments of risk and include, for example, natural disasters, structural failures, hostile cyber attacks, and errors of omission/commission. Organizations determine what is considered a sufficient degree of separation between primary and alternate storage sites based on the types of threats that are of concern. For one particular type of threat (i.e., hostile cyber attack), the degree of separation between sites is less relevant. Related control: RA-3. |
link |
6 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
CP-6 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_CP-6 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 CP-6 |
Contingency Planning |
Alternate Storage Site |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Establishes an alternate storage site including necessary agreements to permit the storage and retrieval of information system backup information; and
b. Ensures that the alternate storage site provides information security safeguards equivalent to that of the primary site.
Supplemental Guidance: Alternate storage sites are sites that are geographically distinct from primary storage sites. An alternate storage site maintains duplicate copies of information and data in the event that the primary storage site is not available. Items covered by alternate storage site agreements include, for example, environmental conditions at alternate sites, access rules, physical and environmental protection requirements, and coordination of delivery/retrieval of backup
media. Alternate storage sites reflect the requirements in contingency plans so that organizations can maintain essential missions/business functions despite disruption, compromise, or failure in organizational information systems. Related controls: CP-2, CP-7, CP-9, CP-10, MP-4.
References: NIST Special Publication 800-34. |
link |
7 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
CP-6(1) |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_CP-6(1) |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 CP-6 (1) |
Contingency Planning |
Separation From Primary Site |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization identifies an alternate storage site that is separated from the primary storage site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats.
Supplemental Guidance: Threats that affect alternate storage sites are typically defined in organizational assessments of risk and include, for example, natural disasters, structural failures, hostile cyber attacks, and errors of omission/commission. Organizations determine what is considered a sufficient degree of separation between primary and alternate storage sites based on the types of threats that are of concern. For one particular type of threat (i.e., hostile cyber attack), the degree of separation between sites is less relevant. Related control: RA-3. |
link |
6 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
CP-6 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_CP-6 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CP-6 |
Contingency Planning |
Alternate Storage Site |
Shared |
n/a |
a. Establish an alternate storage site, including necessary agreements to permit the storage and retrieval of system backup information; and
b. Ensure that the alternate storage site provides controls equivalent to that of the primary site. |
link |
7 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
CP-6(1) |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_CP-6(1) |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CP-6 (1) |
Contingency Planning |
Separation from Primary Site |
Shared |
n/a |
Identify an alternate storage site that is sufficiently separated from the primary storage site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats. |
link |
6 |
| RMiT_v1.0 |
10.51 |
RMiT_v1.0_10.51 |
RMiT 10.51 |
Cloud Services |
Cloud Services - 10.51 |
Shared |
n/a |
A financial institution is required to consult the Bank prior to the use of public cloud for critical systems. The financial institution is expected to demonstrate that specific risks associated with the use of cloud services for critical systems have been adequately considered and addressed. The risk assessment shall address the risks outlined in paragraph 10.49 as well as the following areas:
(a) the adequacy of the overarching cloud adoption strategy of the financial institution including:
(i) board oversight over cloud strategy and cloud operational management;
(ii) senior management roles and responsibilities on cloud management;
(iii) conduct of day-to-day operational management functions;
(iv) management and oversight by the financial institution of cloud service providers;
(v) quality of risk management and internal control functions; and
(vi) strength of in-house competency and experience;
(b) the availability of independent, internationally recognised certifications of the cloud service providers, at a minimum, in the following areas:
(i) information security management framework, including cryptographic modules such as used for encryption and decryption of user data; and
(ii) cloud-specific security controls for protection of customer and counterparty or proprietary information including payment transaction data in use, in storage and in transit; and
(c) the degree to which the selected cloud configuration adequately addresses the following attributes:
(i) geographical redundancy;
(ii) high availability;
(iii) scalability;
(iv) portability;
(v) interoperability; and
(vi) strong recovery and resumption capability including appropriate alternate Internet path to protect against potential Internet faults. |
link |
7 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2021 |
2.5A |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2021_2.5A |
SWIFT CSCF v2021 2.5A |
Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
External Transmission Data Protection |
|
n/a |
Protect the confidentiality of SWIFT-related data transmitted or stored outside of the secure zone as part of operational processes. |
link |
11 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2022 |
2.5A |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022_2.5A |
SWIFT CSCF v2022 2.5A |
2. Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
External Transmission Data Protection |
Customer |
n/a |
Protect the confidentiality of SWIFT-related data transmitted or stored outside of the secure zone as part of operational processes. |
link |
6 |