last sync: 2025-Apr-29 17:16:02 UTC

Function apps should have Client Certificates (Incoming client certificates) enabled

Azure BuiltIn Policy definition

Source Azure Portal
Display name Function apps should have Client Certificates (Incoming client certificates) enabled
Id ab6a902f-9493-453b-928d-62c30b11b5a6
Version 1.0.0
Details on versioning
Versioning Versions supported for Versioning: 1
1.0.0
Built-in Versioning [Preview]
Category App Service
Microsoft Learn
Description Client certificates allow for the app to request a certificate for incoming requests. Only clients that have a valid certificate will be able to reach the app. This policy applies to apps with Http version set to 1.1.
Cloud environments AzureCloud = true
AzureUSGovernment = true
AzureChinaCloud = unknown
Available in AzUSGov The Policy is available in AzureUSGovernment cloud. Version: '1.*.*'
Mode Indexed
Type BuiltIn
Preview False
Deprecated False
Effect Default
AuditIfNotExists
Allowed
AuditIfNotExists, Disabled
RBAC role(s) none
Rule aliases IF (1)
Alias Namespace ResourceType Path PathIsDefault DefaultPath Modifiable
Microsoft.Web/sites/clientCertEnabled Microsoft.Web sites properties.clientCertEnabled True False
THEN-ExistenceCondition (1)
Alias Namespace ResourceType Path PathIsDefault DefaultPath Modifiable
Microsoft.Web/sites/config/web.http20Enabled Microsoft.Web sites/config properties.http20Enabled True False
Rule resource types IF (1)
Compliance
The following 18 compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Function apps should have Client Certificates (Incoming client certificates) enabled' (ab6a902f-9493-453b-928d-62c30b11b5a6)
Control Domain Control Name MetadataId Category Title Owner Requirements Description Info Policy#
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0 PV-2 Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0_PV-2 Microsoft cloud security benchmark PV-2 Posture and Vulnerability Management Audit and enforce secure configurations Shared **Security Principle:** Continuously monitor and alert when there is a deviation from the defined configuration baseline. Enforce the desired configuration according to the baseline configuration by denying the non-compliant configuration or deploy a configuration. **Azure Guidance:** Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to configure Azure Policy to audit and enforce configurations of your Azure resources. Use Azure Monitor to create alerts when there is a configuration deviation detected on the resources. Use Azure Policy [deny] and [deploy if not exist] rule to enforce secure configuration across Azure resources. For resource configuration audit and enforcement not supported by Azure Policy, you may need to write your own scripts or use third-party tooling to implement the configuration audit and enforcement. **Implementation and additional context:** Understand Azure Policy effects: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/concepts/effects Create and manage policies to enforce compliance: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/tutorials/create-and-manage Get compliance data of Azure resources: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/how-to/get-compliance-data n/a link 27
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_21 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_21 EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 21 Cybersecurity risk-management measures Shared n/a Requires essential and important entities to take appropriate measures to manage cybersecurity risks. 193
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. 24 EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._24 EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 24 Chapter 4 - Controller and processor Responsibility of the controller Shared n/a n/a 310
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. 25 EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._25 EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 25 Chapter 4 - Controller and processor Data protection by design and by default Shared n/a n/a 310
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. 28 EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._28 EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 28 Chapter 4 - Controller and processor Processor Shared n/a n/a 310
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. 32 EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._32 EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 32 Chapter 4 - Controller and processor Security of processing Shared n/a n/a 310
FBI_Criminal_Justice_Information_Services_v5.9.5_5 .1 FBI_Criminal_Justice_Information_Services_v5.9.5_5.1 FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) v5.9.5 5.1 Policy and Implementation - Systems And Communications Protection Systems And Communications Protection Shared In addition, applications, services, or information systems must have the capability to ensure system integrity through the detection and protection against unauthorized changes to software and information. Examples of systems and communications safeguards range from boundary and transmission protection to securing an agency's virtualized environment. 110
FedRAMP_High_R4 CM-6 FedRAMP_High_R4_CM-6 FedRAMP High CM-6 Configuration Management Configuration Settings Shared n/a The organization: a. Establishes and documents configuration settings for information technology products employed within the information system using [Assignment: organization-defined security configuration checklists] that reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements; b. Implements the configuration settings; c. Identifies, documents, and approves any deviations from established configuration settings for [Assignment: organization-defined information system components] based on [Assignment: organization-defined operational requirements]; and d. Monitors and controls changes to the configuration settings in accordance with organizational policies and procedures. Supplemental Guidance: Configuration settings are the set of parameters that can be changed in hardware, software, or firmware components of the information system that affect the security posture and/or functionality of the system. Information technology products for which security- related configuration settings can be defined include, for example, mainframe computers, servers (e.g., database, electronic mail, authentication, web, proxy, file, domain name), workstations, input/output devices (e.g., scanners, copiers, and printers), network components (e.g., firewalls, routers, gateways, voice and data switches, wireless access points, network appliances, sensors), operating systems, middleware, and applications. Security-related parameters are those parameters impacting the security state of information systems including the parameters required to satisfy other security control requirements. Security-related parameters include, for example: (i) registry settings; (ii) account, file, directory permission settings; and (iii) settings for functions, ports, protocols, services, and remote connections. Organizations establish organization-wide configuration settings and subsequently derive specific settings for information systems. The established settings become part of the systems configuration baseline. Common secure configurations (also referred to as security configuration checklists, lockdown and hardening guides, security reference guides, security technical implementation guides) provide recognized, standardized, and established benchmarks that stipulate secure configuration settings for specific information technology platforms/products and instructions for configuring those information system components to meet operational requirements. Common secure configurations can be developed by a variety of organizations including, for example, information technology product developers, manufacturers, vendors, consortia, academia, industry, federal agencies, and other organizations in the public and private sectors. Common secure configurations include the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) which affects the implementation of CM-6 and other controls such as AC-19 and CM-7. The Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) and the defined standards within the protocol (e.g., Common Configuration Enumeration) provide an effective method to uniquely identify, track, and control configuration settings. OMB establishes federal policy on configuration requirements for federal information systems. Related controls: AC-19, CM-2, CM-3, CM-7, SI-4. References: OMB Memoranda 07-11, 07-18, 08-22; NIST Special Publications 800-70, 800-128; Web: http://nvd.nist.gov, http://checklists.nist.gov, http://www.nsa.gov. link 23
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 10.g HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_10.g HITRUST CSF v11.3 10.g Cryptographic Controls Ensure key management's support to the organization’s use of cryptographic techniques. Shared 1. All cryptographic keys are to be protected against modification, loss, and destruction. 2. Secret/private keys, including split-keys, are to be protected against unauthorized disclosure. Key management shall be in place to support the organization’s use of cryptographic techniques. 7
New_Zealand_ISM 14.5.8.C.01 New_Zealand_ISM_14.5.8.C.01 New_Zealand_ISM_14.5.8.C.01 14. Software security 14.5.8.C.01 Web applications n/a Agencies SHOULD follow the documentation provided in the Open Web Application Security Project guide to building secure Web applications and Web services. 18
NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1 SC.23.5 NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1_SC.23.5 NIST SP 800-53 R5.1.1 SC.23.5 System and Communications Protection Session Authenticity | Allowed Certificate Authorities Shared Only allow the use of [Assignment: organization-defined certificate authorities] for verification of the establishment of protected sessions. Reliance on certificate authorities for the establishment of secure sessions includes the use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificates. These certificates, after verification by their respective certificate authorities, facilitate the establishment of protected sessions between web clients and web servers. 1
NZISM_v3.7 17.9.37.C.01. NZISM_v3.7_17.9.37.C.01. NZISM v3.7 17.9.37.C.01. Key Management 17.9.37.C.01. - enhance the overall security posture of the systems and the sensitive information they protect. Shared n/a Agencies MUST comply with NZCSI when using HACE. 5
SOC_2023 CC2.3 SOC_2023_CC2.3 SOC 2023 CC2.3 Information and Communication Facilitate effective internal communication. Shared n/a Entity to communicate with external parties regarding matters affecting the functioning of internal control. 218
SOC_2023 CC5.3 SOC_2023_CC5.3 SOC 2023 CC5.3 Control Activities Maintain alignment with organizational objectives and regulatory requirements. Shared n/a Entity deploys control activities through policies that establish what is expected and in procedures that put policies into action by establishing Policies and Procedures to Support Deployment of Management’s Directives, Responsibility and Accountability for Executing Policies and Procedures, perform tasks in a timely manner, taking corrective actions, perform using competent personnel and reassess policies and procedures. 229
SOC_2023 CC6.1 SOC_2023_CC6.1 SOC 2023 CC6.1 Logical and Physical Access Controls Mitigate security events and ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical information assets. Shared n/a Entity implements logical access security software, infrastructure, and architectures over protected information assets to protect them from security events to meet the entity's objectives by identifying and managing the inventory of information assets, restricting logical access, identification and authentication of users, consider network segmentation, manage points of access, restricting access of information assets, managing identification and authentication, managing credentials for infrastructure and software, using encryption to protect data and protect using encryption keys. 128
SOC_2023 CC7.4 SOC_2023_CC7.4 SOC 2023 CC7.4 Systems Operations Effectively manage security incidents, minimize their impact, and protect assets, operations, and reputation. Shared n/a The entity responds to identified security incidents by: a. Executing a defined incident-response program to understand, contain, remediate, and communicate security incidents by assigning roles and responsibilities; b. Establishing procedures to contain security incidents; c. Mitigating ongoing security incidents, End Threats Posed by Security Incidents; d. Restoring operations; e. Developing and Implementing Communication Protocols for Security Incidents; f. Obtains Understanding of Nature of Incident and Determines Containment Strategy; g. Remediation Identified Vulnerabilities; h. Communicating Remediation Activities; and, i. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Incident Response and periodic incident evaluations. 213
SOC_2023 CC9.1 SOC_2023_CC9.1 SOC 2023 CC9.1 Risk Mitigation Enhance resilience and ensure continuity of critical operations in the face of adverse events or threats. Shared n/a Entity identifies, selects, and develops risk mitigation activities for risks arising from potential business disruptions. 18
UK_NCSC_CAF_v3.2 B2.a UK_NCSC_CAF_v3.2_B2.a NCSC Cyber Assurance Framework (CAF) v3.2 B2.a Identity and Access Control Identity Verification, Authentication and Authorisation Shared 1. The process of initial identity verification is robust enough to provide a high level of confidence of a user’s identity profile before allowing an authorised user access to networks and information systems that support the essential function. 2. Only authorised and individually authenticated users can physically access and logically connect to the networks or information systems on which that essential function depends. 3. The number of authorised users and systems that have access to all the networks and information systems supporting the essential function is limited to the minimum necessary. 4. Use additional authentication mechanisms, such as multi-factor (MFA), for privileged access to all systems that operate or support the essential function. 5. Use additional authentication mechanisms, such as multi-factor (MFA), when there is individual authentication and authorisation of all remote user access to all the networks and information systems that support the essential function. 6. The list of users and systems with access to networks and systems supporting and delivering the essential functions reviewed on a regular basis, at least every six months. The organisation understands, documents and manages access to networks and information systems supporting the operation of essential functions. Users (or automated functions) that can access data or systems are appropriately verified, authenticated and authorised. Robustly verify, authenticate and authorise access to the networks and information systems supporting the essential function. 32
Initiatives usage
Initiative DisplayName Initiative Id Initiative Category State Type polSet in AzUSGov
EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 42346945-b531-41d8-9e46-f95057672e88 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 7326812a-86a4-40c8-af7c-8945de9c4913 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) v5.9.5 4fcabc2a-30b2-4ba5-9fbb-b1a4e08fb721 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
FedRAMP High d5264498-16f4-418a-b659-fa7ef418175f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
HITRUST CSF v11.3 e0d47b75-5d99-442a-9d60-07f2595ab095 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
Microsoft cloud security benchmark 1f3afdf9-d0c9-4c3d-847f-89da613e70a8 Security Center GA BuiltIn true
NCSC Cyber Assurance Framework (CAF) v3.2 6d220abf-cf6f-4b17-8f7e-0644c4cc84b4 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
New Zealand ISM 4f5b1359-4f8e-4d7c-9733-ea47fcde891e Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
NIST SP 800-53 R5.1.1 60205a79-6280-4e20-a147-e2011e09dc78 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
NZISM v3.7 4476df0a-18ab-4bfe-b6ad-cccae1cf320f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
SOC 2023 53ad89f5-8542-49e9-ba81-1cbd686e0d52 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
History
Date/Time (UTC ymd) (i) Change type Change detail
2023-12-08 20:47:07 add ab6a902f-9493-453b-928d-62c30b11b5a6
JSON compare n/a
JSON
api-version=2021-06-01
EPAC