compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Automation account variables should be encrypted' (3657f5a0-770e-44a3-b44e-9431ba1e9735)
| Control Domain |
Control |
Name |
MetadataId |
Category |
Title |
Owner |
Requirements |
Description |
Info |
Policy# |
| Azure_Security_Benchmark_v1.0 |
4.8 |
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v1.0_4.8 |
Azure Security Benchmark 4.8 |
Data Protection |
Encrypt sensitive information at rest |
Customer |
Use encryption at rest on all Azure resources. Microsoft recommends allowing Azure to manage your encryption keys, however there is the option for you to manage your own keys in some instances.
Understand encryption at rest in Azure:
https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/encryption-atrest
How to configure customer managed encryption keys:
https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/storage/common/storage-encryption-keys-portal |
n/a |
link |
7 |
| Azure_Security_Benchmark_v2.0 |
DP-5 |
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v2.0_DP-5 |
Azure Security Benchmark DP-5 |
Data Protection |
Encrypt sensitive data at rest |
Shared |
To complement access controls, data at rest should be protected against ‘out of band’ attacks (such as accessing underlying storage) using encryption. This helps ensure that attackers cannot easily read or modify the data.
Azure provides encryption for data at rest by default. For highly sensitive data, you have options to implement additional encryption at rest on all Azure resources where available. Azure manages your encryption keys by default, but Azure provides options to manage your own keys (customer managed keys) for certain Azure services.
Understand encryption at rest in Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/encryption-atrest#encryption-at-rest-in-microsoft-cloud-services
How to configure customer managed encryption keys: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/storage/common/storage-encryption-keys-portal
Encryption model and key management table: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/encryption-models
Data at rest double encryption in Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/double-encryption#data-at-rest |
n/a |
link |
13 |
| Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0 |
DP-4 |
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0_DP-4 |
Microsoft cloud security benchmark DP-4 |
Data Protection |
Enable data at rest encryption by default |
Shared |
**Security Principle:**
To complement access controls, data at rest should be protected against 'out of band' attacks (such as accessing underlying storage) using encryption. This helps ensure that attackers cannot easily read or modify the data.
**Azure Guidance:**
Many Azure services have data at rest encryption enabled by default at the infrastructure layer using a service-managed key.
Where technically feasible and not enabled by default, you can enable data at rest encryption in the Azure services, or in your VMs for storage level, file level, or database level encryption.
**Implementation and additional context:**
Understand encryption at rest in Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/encryption-atrest#encryption-at-rest-in-microsoft-cloud-services
Data at rest double encryption in Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/encryption-models
Encryption model and key management table:
https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security/fundamentals/encryption-models |
n/a |
link |
9 |
| CMMC_2.0_L2 |
SC.L2-3.13.16 |
CMMC_2.0_L2_SC.L2-3.13.16 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
15 |
| CMMC_L3 |
SC.3.177 |
CMMC_L3_SC.3.177 |
CMMC L3 SC.3.177 |
System and Communications Protection |
Employ FIPS-validated cryptography when used to protect the confidentiality of CUI. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Cryptography can be employed to support many security solutions including the protection of controlled unclassified information, the provision of digital signatures, and the enforcement of information separation when authorized individuals have the necessary clearances for such information but lack the necessary formal access approvals. Cryptography can also be used to support random number generation and hash generation. Cryptographic standards include FIPSvalidated cryptography and/or NSA-approved cryptography. |
link |
26 |
| CMMC_L3 |
SC.3.191 |
CMMC_L3_SC.3.191 |
CMMC L3 SC.3.191 |
System and Communications Protection |
Protect the confidentiality of CUI at rest. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Information at rest refers to the state of information when it is not in process or in transit and is located on storage devices as specific components of systems. The focus of protection at rest is not on the type of storage device or the frequency of access but rather the state of the information. Organizations can use different mechanisms to achieve confidentiality protections, including the use of cryptographic mechanisms and file share scanning. Organizations may also use other controls including secure off-line storage in lieu of online storage when adequate protection of information at rest cannot otherwise be achieved or continuous monitoring to identify malicious code at rest. |
link |
14 |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
SC-28 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_SC-28 |
FedRAMP High SC-28 |
System And Communications Protection |
Protection Of Information At Rest |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system protects the [Selection (one or more): confidentiality; integrity] of [Assignment: organization-defined information at rest].
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the confidentiality and integrity of information at rest and covers user information and system information. Information at rest refers to the state of information when it is located on storage devices as specific components of information systems. System-related information requiring protection includes, for example, configurations or rule sets for firewalls, gateways, intrusion detection/prevention systems, filtering routers, and authenticator content. Organizations may employ different mechanisms to achieve confidentiality and integrity protections, including the use of cryptographic mechanisms and file share scanning. Integrity protection can be achieved, for example, by implementing Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) technologies. Organizations may also employ other security controls including, for example, secure off-line storage in lieu of online storage when adequate protection of information at rest cannot otherwise be achieved and/or continuous monitoring to identify malicious code at rest. Related controls: AC-3, AC-6, CA-7, CM-3, CM-5, CM-6, PE-3, SC-8, SC-13, SI-3, SI-7.
References: NIST Special Publications 800-56, 800-57, 800-111. |
link |
17 |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
SC-28(1) |
FedRAMP_High_R4_SC-28(1) |
FedRAMP High SC-28 (1) |
System And Communications Protection |
Cryptographic Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system implements cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure and modification of [Assignment: organization-defined information] on [Assignment: organization-defined information system components].
Supplemental Guidance: Selection of cryptographic mechanisms is based on the need to protect the confidentiality and integrity of organizational information. The strength of mechanism is commensurate with the security category and/or classification of the information. This control enhancement applies to significant concentrations of digital media in organizational areas designated for media storage and also to limited quantities of media generally associated with information system components in operational environments (e.g., portable storage devices, mobile devices). Organizations have the flexibility to either encrypt all information on storage devices (i.e., full disk encryption) or encrypt specific data structures (e.g., files, records, or fields). Organizations employing cryptographic mechanisms to protect information at rest also consider cryptographic key management solutions. Related controls: AC-19, SC-12. |
link |
17 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
SC-28 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_SC-28 |
FedRAMP Moderate SC-28 |
System And Communications Protection |
Protection Of Information At Rest |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system protects the [Selection (one or more): confidentiality; integrity] of [Assignment: organization-defined information at rest].
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the confidentiality and integrity of information at rest and covers user information and system information. Information at rest refers to the state of information when it is located on storage devices as specific components of information systems. System-related information requiring protection includes, for example, configurations or rule sets for firewalls, gateways, intrusion detection/prevention systems, filtering routers, and authenticator content. Organizations may employ different mechanisms to achieve confidentiality and integrity protections, including the use of cryptographic mechanisms and file share scanning. Integrity protection can be achieved, for example, by implementing Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) technologies. Organizations may also employ other security controls including, for example, secure off-line storage in lieu of online storage when adequate protection of information at rest cannot otherwise be achieved and/or continuous monitoring to identify malicious code at rest. Related controls: AC-3, AC-6, CA-7, CM-3, CM-5, CM-6, PE-3, SC-8, SC-13, SI-3, SI-7.
References: NIST Special Publications 800-56, 800-57, 800-111. |
link |
17 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
SC-28(1) |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_SC-28(1) |
FedRAMP Moderate SC-28 (1) |
System And Communications Protection |
Cryptographic Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system implements cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure and modification of [Assignment: organization-defined information] on [Assignment: organization-defined information system components].
Supplemental Guidance: Selection of cryptographic mechanisms is based on the need to protect the confidentiality and integrity of organizational information. The strength of mechanism is commensurate with the security category and/or classification of the information. This control enhancement applies to significant concentrations of digital media in organizational areas designated for media storage and also to limited quantities of media generally associated with information system components in operational environments (e.g., portable storage devices, mobile devices). Organizations have the flexibility to either encrypt all information on storage devices (i.e., full disk encryption) or encrypt specific data structures (e.g., files, records, or fields). Organizations employing cryptographic mechanisms to protect information at rest also consider cryptographic key management solutions. Related controls: AC-19, SC-12. |
link |
17 |
| ISO27001-2013 |
A.10.1.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.10.1.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.10.1.1 |
Cryptography |
Policy on the use of cryptographic controls |
Shared |
n/a |
A policy on the use of cryptographic controls for protection of information shall be developed and implemented. |
link |
18 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.13.16 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.13.16 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.13.16 |
System and Communications Protection |
Protect the confidentiality of CUI at rest. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Information at rest refers to the state of information when it is not in process or in transit and is located on storage devices as specific components of systems. The focus of protection at rest is not on the type of storage device or the frequency of access but rather the state of the information. Organizations can use different mechanisms to achieve confidentiality protections, including the use of cryptographic mechanisms and file share scanning. Organizations may also use other controls including secure off-line storage in lieu of online storage when adequate protection of information at rest cannot otherwise be achieved or continuous monitoring to identify malicious code at rest. See [NIST CRYPTO]. |
link |
19 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
SC-28 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_SC-28 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 SC-28 |
System And Communications Protection |
Protection Of Information At Rest |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system protects the [Selection (one or more): confidentiality; integrity] of [Assignment: organization-defined information at rest].
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the confidentiality and integrity of information at rest and covers user information and system information. Information at rest refers to the state of information when it is located on storage devices as specific components of information systems. System-related information requiring protection includes, for example, configurations or rule sets for firewalls, gateways, intrusion detection/prevention systems, filtering routers, and authenticator content. Organizations may employ different mechanisms to achieve confidentiality and integrity protections, including the use of cryptographic mechanisms and file share scanning. Integrity protection can be achieved, for example, by implementing Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) technologies. Organizations may also employ other security controls including, for example, secure off-line storage in lieu of online storage when adequate protection of information at rest cannot otherwise be achieved and/or continuous monitoring to identify malicious code at rest. Related controls: AC-3, AC-6, CA-7, CM-3, CM-5, CM-6, PE-3, SC-8, SC-13, SI-3, SI-7.
References: NIST Special Publications 800-56, 800-57, 800-111. |
link |
17 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
SC-28(1) |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_SC-28(1) |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 SC-28 (1) |
System And Communications Protection |
Cryptographic Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system implements cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure and modification of [Assignment: organization-defined information] on [Assignment: organization-defined information system components].
Supplemental Guidance: Selection of cryptographic mechanisms is based on the need to protect the confidentiality and integrity of organizational information. The strength of mechanism is commensurate with the security category and/or classification of the information. This control enhancement applies to significant concentrations of digital media in organizational areas designated for media storage and also to limited quantities of media generally associated with information system components in operational environments (e.g., portable storage devices, mobile devices). Organizations have the flexibility to either encrypt all information on storage devices (i.e., full disk encryption) or encrypt specific data structures (e.g., files, records, or fields). Organizations employing cryptographic mechanisms to protect information at rest also consider cryptographic key management solutions. Related controls: AC-19, SC-12. |
link |
17 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
SC-28 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_SC-28 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-28 |
System and Communications Protection |
Protection of Information at Rest |
Shared |
n/a |
Protect the [Selection (OneOrMore): confidentiality;integrity] of the following information at rest: [Assignment: organization-defined information at rest]. |
link |
17 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
SC-28(1) |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_SC-28(1) |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-28 (1) |
System and Communications Protection |
Cryptographic Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
Implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure and modification of the following information at rest on [Assignment: organization-defined system components or media]: [Assignment: organization-defined information]. |
link |
17 |
| NZ_ISM_v3.5 |
CR-3 |
NZ_ISM_v3.5_CR-3 |
NZISM Security Benchmark CR-3 |
Cryptography |
17.1.53 Reducing storage and physical transfer requirements |
Customer |
n/a |
When encryption is applied to media or media residing within IT equipment it provides an additional layer of defence. Whilst such measures do not reduce or alter the classification of the information itself, physical storage, handling and transfer requirements may be reduced to those of a lesser classification for the media or equipment (but not the data itself). |
link |
12 |
| PCI_DSS_V3.2.1 |
3.4 |
PCI_DSS_v3.2.1_3.4 |
PCI DSS v3.2.1 3.4 |
Requirement 3 |
PCI DSS requirement 3.4 |
customer |
n/a |
n/a |
link |
8 |
| PCI_DSS_V3.2.1 |
4.1 |
PCI_DSS_v3.2.1_4.1 |
PCI DSS v3.2.1 4.1 |
Requirement 4 |
PCI DSS requirement 4.1 |
customer |
n/a |
n/a |
link |
8 |
| PCI_DSS_V3.2.1 |
6.5.3 |
PCI_DSS_v3.2.1_6.5.3 |
PCI DSS v3.2.1 6.5.3 |
Requirement 6 |
PCI DSS requirement 6.5.3 |
shared |
n/a |
n/a |
link |
8 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0 |
3.5.1 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0_3.5.1 |
PCI DSS v4.0 3.5.1 |
Requirement 03: Protect Stored Account Data |
Primary account number (PAN) is secured wherever it is stored |
Shared |
n/a |
PAN is rendered unreadable anywhere it is stored by using any of the following approaches:
• One-way hashes based on strong cryptography of the entire PAN.
• Truncation (hashing cannot be used to replace the truncated segment of PAN).
– If hashed and truncated versions of the same PAN, or different truncation formats of the same PAN, are present in an environment, additional controls are in place such that the different versions cannot be correlated to reconstruct the original PAN.
• Index tokens.
• Strong cryptography with associated keymanagement processes and procedures. |
link |
12 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0 |
6.2.4 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0_6.2.4 |
PCI DSS v4.0 6.2.4 |
Requirement 06: Develop and Maintain Secure Systems and Software |
Bespoke and custom software are developed securely |
Shared |
n/a |
Software engineering techniques or other methods are defined and in use for bespoke and custom software by software development personnel to prevent or mitigate common software attacks and related vulnerabilities, including but not limited to the following:
• Injection attacks, including SQL, LDAP, XPath, or other command, parameter, object, fault, or injection-type flaws.
• Attacks on data and data structures, including attempts to manipulate buffers, pointers, input data, or shared data.
• Attacks on cryptography usage, including attempts to exploit weak, insecure, or inappropriate cryptographic implementations, algorithms, cipher suites, or modes of operation.
• Attacks on business logic, including attempts to abuse or bypass application features and functionalities through the manipulation of APIs, communication protocols and channels, clientside functionality, or other system/application functions and resources. This includes cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
• Attacks on access control mechanisms, including attempts to bypass or abuse identification, authentication, or authorization mechanisms, or attempts to exploit weaknesses in the implementation of such mechanisms.
• Attacks via any “high-risk” vulnerabilities identified in the vulnerability identification process, as defined in Requirement 6.3.1. |
link |
8 |
| RBI_CSF_Banks_v2016 |
13.4 |
RBI_CSF_Banks_v2016_13.4 |
|
Advanced Real-Timethreat Defenceand Management |
Advanced Real-Timethreat Defenceand Management-13.4 |
|
n/a |
Consider implementingsecure web gateways with capability to deep scan network packets including secure (HTTPS, etc.) traffic passing through the web/internet gateway |
|
43 |
| RBI_ITF_NBFC_v2017 |
3.1.h |
RBI_ITF_NBFC_v2017_3.1.h |
RBI IT Framework 3.1.h |
Information and Cyber Security |
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)-3.1 |
|
n/a |
The IS Policy must provide for a IS framework with the following basic tenets:
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) - NBFCs may increase the usage of PKI to ensure confidentiality of data, access control, data integrity, authentication and nonrepudiation. |
link |
32 |
| SOC_2 |
CC6.1 |
SOC_2_CC6.1 |
SOC 2 Type 2 CC6.1 |
Logical and Physical Access Controls |
Logical access security software, infrastructure, and architectures |
Shared |
The customer is responsible for implementing this recommendation. |
The following points of focus, specifically related to all engagements using the trust services criteria, highlight important characteristics relating to this criterion:
• Identifies and Manages the Inventory of Information Assets — The entity identifies,
Page 29
TSP
Ref. #
TRUST SERVICES CRITERIA AND POINTS OF FOCUS
inventories, classifies, and manages information assets.
• Restricts Logical Access — Logical access to information assets, including hardware, data (at-rest, during processing, or in transmission), software, administrative
authorities, mobile devices, output, and offline system components is restricted
through the use of access control software and rule sets.
• Identifies and Authenticates Users — Persons, infrastructure, and software are
identified and authenticated prior to accessing information assets, whether locally
or remotely.
• Considers Network Segmentation — Network segmentation permits unrelated portions of the entity's information system to be isolated from each other.
• Manages Points of Access — Points of access by outside entities and the types of
data that flow through the points of access are identified, inventoried, and managed. The types of individuals and systems using each point of access are identified,
documented, and managed.
• Restricts Access to Information Assets — Combinations of data classification, separate data structures, port restrictions, access protocol restrictions, user identification, and digital certificates are used to establish access-control rules for information assets.
• Manages Identification and Authentication — Identification and authentication requirements are established, documented, and managed for individuals and systems
accessing entity information, infrastructure, and software.
• Manages Credentials for Infrastructure and Software — New internal and external
infrastructure and software are registered, authorized, and documented prior to being granted access credentials and implemented on the network or access point.
Credentials are removed and access is disabled when access is no longer required
or the infrastructure and software are no longer in use.
• Uses Encryption to Protect Data — The entity uses encryption to supplement other
measures used to protect data at rest, when such protections are deemed appropriate based on assessed risk.
• Protects Encryption Keys — Processes are in place to protect encryption keys during generation, storage, use, and destruction |
|
80 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2021 |
2.1 |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2021_2.1 |
SWIFT CSCF v2021 2.1 |
Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
Internal Data Flow Security |
|
n/a |
Ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of application data flows between local SWIFT-related applications. |
link |
14 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2021 |
2.4A |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2021_2.4A |
SWIFT CSCF v2021 2.4A |
Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
Back-office Data Flow Security |
|
n/a |
Ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and mutual authenticity of data flows between local or remote SWIFT infrastructure components and the back office first hops they connect to. |
link |
7 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2021 |
2.5A |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2021_2.5A |
SWIFT CSCF v2021 2.5A |
Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
External Transmission Data Protection |
|
n/a |
Protect the confidentiality of SWIFT-related data transmitted or stored outside of the secure zone as part of operational processes. |
link |
12 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2022 |
2.1 |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022_2.1 |
SWIFT CSCF v2022 2.1 |
2. Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
Ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of application data flows between local SWIFT-related components. |
Shared |
n/a |
Confidentiality, integrity, and authentication mechanisms are implemented to protect SWIFT-related component-to-component or system-to-system data flows. |
link |
36 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2022 |
2.4A |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022_2.4A |
SWIFT CSCF v2022 2.4A |
2. Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
Back-office Data Flow Security |
Customer |
n/a |
Ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and mutual authenticity of data flows between local or remote SWIFT infrastructure components and the back office first hops they connect to. |
link |
3 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2022 |
2.5A |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022_2.5A |
SWIFT CSCF v2022 2.5A |
2. Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
External Transmission Data Protection |
Customer |
n/a |
Protect the confidentiality of SWIFT-related data transmitted or stored outside of the secure zone as part of operational processes. |
link |
7 |
|
U.07.3 - Management features |
U.07.3 - Management features |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
19 |
|
U.11.1 - Policy |
U.11.1 - Policy |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
19 |
|
U.11.2 - Cryptographic measures |
U.11.2 - Cryptographic measures |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
19 |
| UK_NCSC_CSP |
2.3 |
UK_NCSC_CSP_2.3 |
UK NCSC CSP 2.3 |
Asset protection and resilience |
Data at rest protection |
Shared |
n/a |
To ensure data is not available to unauthorised parties with physical access to infrastructure, user data held within the service should be protected regardless of the storage media on which it’s held. Without appropriate measures in place, data may be inadvertently disclosed on discarded, lost or stolen media. |
link |
4 |