compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Public network access on Azure SQL Database should be disabled' (1b8ca024-1d5c-4dec-8995-b1a932b41780)
| Control Domain |
Control |
Name |
MetadataId |
Category |
Title |
Owner |
Requirements |
Description |
Info |
Policy# |
| Azure_Security_Benchmark_v2.0 |
NS-1 |
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v2.0_NS-1 |
Azure Security Benchmark NS-1 |
Network Security |
Implement security for internal traffic |
Customer |
Ensure that all Azure virtual networks follow an enterprise segmentation principle that aligns to the business risks. Any system that could incur higher risk for the organization should be isolated within its own virtual network and sufficiently secured with either a network security group (NSG) and/or Azure Firewall.
Based on your applications and enterprise segmentation strategy, restrict or allow traffic between internal resources based on network security group rules. For specific well-defined applications (such as a 3-tier app), this can be a highly secure "deny by default, permit by exception" approach. This might not scale well if you have many applications and endpoints interacting with each other. You can also use Azure Firewall in circumstances where central management is required over a large number of enterprise segments or spokes (in a hub/spoke topology).
Use Azure Security Center Adaptive Network Hardening to recommend network security group configurations that limit ports and source IPs based with the reference to external network traffic rules.
Use Azure Sentinel to discover the use of legacy insecure protocols such as SSL/TLSv1, SMBv1, LM/NTLMv1, wDigest, Unsigned LDAP Binds, and weak ciphers in Kerberos.
How to create a network security group with security rules: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/virtual-network/tutorial-filter-network-traffic
How to deploy and configure Azure Firewall: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/firewall/tutorial-firewall-deploy-portal
Adaptive Network Hardening in Azure Security Center: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/security-center/security-center-adaptive-network-hardening
Azure Sentinel insecure protocols workbook:https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/sentinel/quickstart-get-visibility#use-built-in-workbooks |
n/a |
link |
18 |
| Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0 |
NS-2 |
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0_NS-2 |
Microsoft cloud security benchmark NS-2 |
Network Security |
Secure cloud services with network controls |
Shared |
**Security Principle:**
Secure cloud services by establishing a private access point for the resources. You should also disable or restrict access from public network when possible.
**Azure Guidance:**
Deploy private endpoints for all Azure resources that support the Private Link feature, to establish a private access point for the resources. You should also disable or restrict public network access to services where feasible.
For certain services, you also have the option to deploy VNet integration for the service where you can restrict the VNET to establish a private access point for the service.
**Implementation and additional context:**
Understand Azure Private Link:
https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/private-link/private-link-overview |
n/a |
link |
40 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
AC_4(21) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_AC_4(21) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 AC 4(21) |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Information Flow Enforcement | Physical / Logical Separation of Information Flows |
Shared |
The information system separates information flows logically or physically using session encryption to accomplish separation of all sessions. |
To enhance security measures and safeguard sensitive data from unauthorized access or interception. |
|
27 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
CA_3 |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CA_3 |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CA 3 |
Information System Connections |
System Interconnections |
Shared |
1. The organization authorizes connection from information system to other information system through the use of Interconnection Security Agreements.
2. The organization documents, for each interconnection, the interface characteristics, security requirements, and the nature of the information communicated.
3. The organization reviews and updates Interconnection Security Agreements annually. |
To establish and maintain secure connections between information systems. |
|
76 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
CA_3(3) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CA_3(3) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CA 3(3) |
Information System Connections |
System Interconnections | Classified Non-National Security System Connections |
Shared |
The organization prohibits the direct connection of any internal network or system to an external network without the use of security controls approved by the information owner. |
To ensure the integrity and security of internal systems against external threats. |
|
76 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
CA_3(5) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CA_3(5) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CA 3(5) |
Information System Connections |
System Interconnections | Restrictions on External Network Connections |
Shared |
The organization employs allow-all, deny-by-exception; deny-all policy for allowing any systems to connect to external information systems. |
To enhance security posture against unauthorized access. |
|
76 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
CA_7 |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CA_7 |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CA 7 |
Continuous Monitoring |
Continuous Monitoring |
Shared |
1. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes establishment of organization-defined metrics to be monitored.
2. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes establishment of at least monthly monitoring and assessments of at least operating system scans, database, and web application scan.
3. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes ongoing security control assessments in accordance with the organizational continuous monitoring strategy.
4. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes ongoing security status monitoring of organization-defined metrics in accordance with the organizational continuous monitoring strategy.
5. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes correlation and analysis of security-related information generated by assessments and monitoring.
6. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes response actions to address results of the analysis of security-related information.
7. The organization develops a continuous monitoring strategy and implements a continuous monitoring program that includes reporting the security status of organization and the information system to organization-defined personnel or roles at organization-defined frequency. |
To ensure the ongoing effectiveness of security controls and maintain the security posture in alignment with organizational objectives and requirements. |
|
120 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_3 |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_3 |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 3 |
Malicious Code Protection |
Malicious Code Protection |
Shared |
1. The organization employs malicious code protection mechanisms at information system entry and exit points to detect and eradicate malicious code.
2. The organization updates malicious code protection mechanisms whenever new releases are available in accordance with organizational configuration management policy and procedures.
3. The organization configures malicious code protection mechanisms to:
a. Perform periodic scans of the information system at least weekly and real-time scans of files from external sources at endpoints and network entry/exit points as the files are downloaded, opened, or executed in accordance with organizational security policy; and
b. Block and quarantine malicious code; send alert to the key role as defined in the system and information integrity policy in response to malicious code detection.
4. The organization addresses the receipt of false positives during malicious code detection and eradication and the resulting potential impact on the availability of the information system. |
To mitigate potential impacts on system availability. |
|
52 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_3(1) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_3(1) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 3(1) |
Malicious Code Protection |
Malicious Code Protection | Central Management |
Shared |
The organization centrally manages malicious code protection mechanisms. |
To centrally manage malicious code protection mechanisms. |
|
51 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_3(2) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_3(2) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 3(2) |
Malicious Code Protection |
Malicious Code Protection | Automatic Updates |
Shared |
The information system automatically updates malicious code protection mechanisms. |
To ensure automatic updates in malicious code protection mechanisms. |
|
51 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_3(7) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_3(7) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 3(7) |
Malicious Code Protection |
Malicious Code Protection | Non Signature-Based Detection |
Shared |
The information system implements non-signature-based malicious code detection mechanisms. |
To enhance overall security posture.
|
|
51 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_4 |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_4 |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 4 |
Information System Monitoring |
Information System Monitoring |
Shared |
1. The organization monitors the information system to detect:
a. Attacks and indicators of potential attacks in accordance with organization-defined monitoring objectives; and
b. Unauthorized local, network, and remote connections;
2. The organization identifies unauthorized use of the information system through organization-defined techniques and methods.
3. The organization deploys monitoring devices: (i) strategically within the information system to collect organization-determined essential information; and (ii) at ad hoc locations within the system to track specific types of transactions of interest to the organization.
4. The organization protects information obtained from intrusion-monitoring tools from unauthorized access, modification, and deletion.
5. The organization heightens the level of information system monitoring activity whenever there is an indication of increased risk to organizational operations and assets, individuals, other organizations, or Canada based on law enforcement information, intelligence information, or other credible sources of information.
6. The organization obtains legal opinion with regard to information system monitoring activities in accordance with organizational policies, directives and standards.
7. The organization provides organization-defined information system monitoring information to organization-defined personnel or roles at an organization-defined frequency. |
To enhance overall security posture.
|
|
93 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_4(1) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_4(1) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 4(1) |
Information System Monitoring |
Information System Monitoring | System-Wide Intrusion Detection System |
Shared |
The organization connects and configures individual intrusion detection tools into an information system-wide intrusion detection system. |
To enhance overall security posture.
|
|
93 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_4(2) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_4(2) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 4(2) |
Information System Monitoring |
Information System Monitoring | Automated Tools for Real-Time Analysis |
Shared |
The organization employs automated tools to support near real-time analysis of events. |
To enhance overall security posture.
|
|
92 |
| Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 |
SI_8(1) |
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_SI_8(1) |
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 SI 8(1) |
Spam Protection |
Spam Protection | Central Management of Protection Mechanisms |
Shared |
The organization centrally manages spam protection mechanisms. |
To enhance overall security posture. |
|
87 |
| CIS_Azure_2.0.0 |
4.1.2 |
CIS_Azure_2.0.0_4.1.2 |
CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark recommendation 4.1.2 |
4.1 |
Ensure no Azure SQL Databases allow ingress from 0.0.0.0/0 (ANY IP) |
Shared |
Disabling `Allow Azure services and resources to access this server` will break all connections to SQL server and Hosted Databases unless custom IP specific rules are added in Firewall Policy. |
Ensure that no SQL Databases allow ingress from 0.0.0.0/0 (ANY IP).
Azure SQL Server includes a firewall to block access to unauthorized connections. More granular IP addresses can be defined by referencing the range of addresses available from specific datacenters.
By default, for a SQL server, a Firewall exists with StartIp of 0.0.0.0 and EndIP of 0.0.0.0 allowing access to all the Azure services.
Additionally, a custom rule can be set up with StartIp of 0.0.0.0 and EndIP of 255.255.255.255 allowing access from ANY IP over the Internet.
In order to reduce the potential attack surface for a SQL server, firewall rules should be defined with more granular IP addresses by referencing the range of addresses available from specific datacenters. |
link |
3 |
| CIS_Azure_Foundations_v2.1.0 |
4.1.2 |
CIS_Azure_Foundations_v2.1.0_4.1.2 |
CIS Azure Foundations v2.1.0 4.1.2 |
Database Services |
Ensure no Azure SQL Databases allow ingress from 0.0.0.0/0 (ANY IP) |
Shared |
n/a |
Ensure that no SQL Databases allow ingress from 0.0.0.0/0 (ANY IP). |
|
1 |
| CIS_Controls_v8.1 |
3.3 |
CIS_Controls_v8.1_3.3 |
CIS Controls v8.1 3.3 |
Data Protection |
Configure data access control lists |
Shared |
1. Configure data access control lists based on a user’s need to know.
2. Apply data access control lists, also known as access permissions, to local and remote file systems, databases, and applications.
|
To ensure that users have access only to the data necessary for their roles. |
|
25 |
| CIS_Controls_v8.1 |
4.1 |
CIS_Controls_v8.1_4.1 |
CIS Controls v8.1 4.1 |
Secure Configuration of Enterprise Assets and Software |
Establish and maintain a secure configuration process. |
Shared |
1. Establish and maintain a secure configuration process for enterprise assets (end-user devices, including portable and mobile; non-computing/IoT devices; and servers) and software (operating systems and applications).
2. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this safeguard. |
To ensure data integrity and safety of enterprise assets. |
|
44 |
| CMMC_2.0_L2 |
AC.L2-3.1.3 |
CMMC_2.0_L2_AC.L2-3.1.3 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
52 |
| CMMC_2.0_L2 |
SC.L1-3.13.1 |
CMMC_2.0_L2_SC.L1-3.13.1 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
56 |
| CMMC_2.0_L2 |
SC.L1-3.13.5 |
CMMC_2.0_L2_SC.L1-3.13.5 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
51 |
| CMMC_2.0_L2 |
SC.L2-3.13.2 |
CMMC_2.0_L2_SC.L2-3.13.2 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
51 |
| CMMC_2.0_L2 |
SC.L2-3.13.6 |
CMMC_2.0_L2_SC.L2-3.13.6 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
26 |
| CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 |
AC.L1_3.1.1 |
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_AC.L1_3.1.1 |
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 AC.L1 3.1.1 |
Access Control |
Authorized Access Control |
Shared |
Limit information system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, or devices (including other information systems). |
To ensure security and integrity. |
|
27 |
| CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 |
AC.L2_3.1.3 |
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_AC.L2_3.1.3 |
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 AC.L2 3.1.3 |
Access Control |
Control CUI Flow |
Shared |
Control the flow of CUI in accordance with approved authorizations. |
To regulate the flow of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in accordance with approved authorizations |
|
46 |
| CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 |
AC.L2_3.1.5 |
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_AC.L2_3.1.5 |
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 AC.L2 3.1.5 |
Access Control |
Least Privilege |
Shared |
Employ the principle of least privilege, including for specific security functions and privileged accounts. |
To restrict information system access. |
|
27 |
| CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 |
SC.L1_3.13.1 |
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_SC.L1_3.13.1 |
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 SC.L1 3.13.1 |
System and Communications Protection |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
Monitor, control, and protect organizational communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational information systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of the information systems. |
To protect information assets from external attacks and insider threats. |
|
43 |
| CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 |
SC.L1_3.13.5 |
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_SC.L1_3.13.5 |
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 SC.L1 3.13.5 |
System and Communications Protection |
Public Access System Separation |
Shared |
Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are physically or logically separated from internal networks. |
To control access, monitor traffic, and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access or exploitation of internal resources. |
|
43 |
| CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 |
SC.L2_3.13.7 |
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_SC.L2_3.13.7 |
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 SC.L2 3.13.7 |
System and Communications Protection |
Split Tunneling |
Shared |
Prevent remote devices from simultaneously establishing non remote connections with organizational systems and communicating via some other connection to resources in external networks (i.e., split tunneling). |
To mitigate security risks. |
|
23 |
| CMMC_L3 |
AC.1.001 |
CMMC_L3_AC.1.001 |
CMMC L3 AC.1.001 |
Access Control |
Limit information system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, and devices (including other information systems). |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Access control policies (e.g., identity- or role-based policies, control matrices, and cryptography) control access between active entities or subjects (i.e., users or processes acting on behalf of users) and passive entities or objects (e.g., devices, files, records, and domains) in systems. Access enforcement mechanisms can be employed at the application and service level to provide increased information security. Other systems include systems internal and external to the organization. This requirement focuses on account management for systems and applications. The definition of and enforcement of access authorizations, other than those determined by account type (e.g., privileged verses non-privileged) are addressed in requirement AC.1.002. |
link |
31 |
| CMMC_L3 |
AC.1.002 |
CMMC_L3_AC.1.002 |
CMMC L3 AC.1.002 |
Access Control |
Limit information system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Organizations may choose to define access privileges or other attributes by account, by type of account, or a combination of both. System account types include individual, shared, group, system, anonymous, guest, emergency, developer, manufacturer, vendor, and temporary. Other attributes required for authorizing access include restrictions on time-of-day, day-of-week, and point-oforigin. In defining other account attributes, organizations consider system-related requirements (e.g., system upgrades scheduled maintenance,) and mission or business requirements, (e.g., time zone differences, customer requirements, remote access to support travel requirements). |
link |
27 |
| CMMC_L3 |
AC.2.016 |
CMMC_L3_AC.2.016 |
CMMC L3 AC.2.016 |
Access Control |
Control the flow of CUI in accordance with approved authorizations. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Information flow control regulates where information can travel within a system and between systems (versus who can access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include the following: keeping exportcontrolled information from being transmitted in the clear to the Internet; blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization; restricting requests to the Internet that are not from the internal web proxy server; and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content.
Organizations commonly use information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of information between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on characteristics of the information or the information path. Enforcement occurs in boundary protection devices (e.g., gateways, routers, guards, encrypted tunnels, firewalls) that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict system services, provide a packetfiltering capability based on header information, or message-filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering and inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement.
Transferring information between systems representing different security domains with different security policies introduces risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners or stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes: prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing access only); employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows; and implementing trustworthy regrading mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels. |
link |
16 |
| CMMC_L3 |
CM.3.068 |
CMMC_L3_CM.3.068 |
CMMC L3 CM.3.068 |
Configuration Management |
Restrict, disable, or prevent the use of nonessential programs, functions, ports, protocols, and services. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Restricting the use of nonessential software (programs) includes restricting the roles allowed to approve program execution; prohibiting auto-execute; program blacklisting and whitelisting; or restricting the number of program instances executed at the same time. The organization makes a security-based determination which functions, ports, protocols, and/or services are restricted. Bluetooth, File Transfer Protocol (FTP), and peer-to-peer networking are examples of protocols organizations consider preventing the use of, restricting, or disabling. |
link |
21 |
| CMMC_L3 |
SC.1.175 |
CMMC_L3_SC.1.175 |
CMMC L3 SC.1.175 |
System and Communications Protection |
Monitor, control, and protect communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of organizational systems. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Communications can be monitored, controlled, and protected at boundary components and by restricting or prohibiting interfaces in organizational systems. Boundary components include gateways, routers, firewalls, guards, network-based malicious code analysis and virtualization systems, or encrypted tunnels implemented within a system security architecture (e.g., routers protecting firewalls or application gateways residing on protected subnetworks). Restricting or prohibiting interfaces in organizational systems includes restricting external web communications traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces and prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses.
Organizations consider the shared nature of commercial telecommunications services in the implementation of security requirements associated with the use of such services. Commercial telecommunications services are commonly based on network components and consolidated management systems shared by all attached commercial customers and may also include third party-provided access lines and other service elements. Such transmission services may represent sources of increased risk despite contract security provisions. |
link |
30 |
| CMMC_L3 |
SC.3.183 |
CMMC_L3_SC.3.183 |
CMMC L3 SC.3.183 |
System and Communications Protection |
Deny network communications traffic by default and allow network communications traffic by exception (i.e., deny all, permit by exception). |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
This requirement applies to inbound and outbound network communications traffic at the system boundary and at identified points within the system. A deny-all, permit-by-exception network communications traffic policy ensures that only those connections which are essential and approved are allowed. |
link |
30 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
DCS_02 |
CSA_v4.0.12_DCS_02 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 DCS 02 |
Datacenter Security |
Off-Site Transfer Authorization Policy and Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
Establish, document, approve, communicate, apply, evaluate and maintain
policies and procedures for the relocation or transfer of hardware, software,
or data/information to an offsite or alternate location. The relocation or transfer
request requires the written or cryptographically verifiable authorization.
Review and update the policies and procedures at least annually. |
|
45 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
DSP_05 |
CSA_v4.0.12_DSP_05 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 DSP 05 |
Data Security and Privacy Lifecycle Management |
Data Flow Documentation |
Shared |
n/a |
Create data flow documentation to identify what data is processed,
stored or transmitted where. Review data flow documentation at defined intervals,
at least annually, and after any change. |
|
57 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
DSP_10 |
CSA_v4.0.12_DSP_10 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 DSP 10 |
Data Security and Privacy Lifecycle Management |
Sensitive Data Transfer |
Shared |
n/a |
Define, implement and evaluate processes, procedures and technical
measures that ensure any transfer of personal or sensitive data is protected
from unauthorized access and only processed within scope as permitted by the
respective laws and regulations. |
|
45 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_02 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_02 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 02 |
Identity & Access Management |
Strong Password Policy and Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
Establish, document, approve, communicate, implement, apply, evaluate
and maintain strong password policies and procedures. Review and update the
policies and procedures at least annually. |
|
52 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_04 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_04 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 04 |
Identity & Access Management |
Separation of Duties |
Shared |
n/a |
Employ the separation of duties principle when implementing information
system access. |
|
43 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_05 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_05 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 05 |
Identity & Access Management |
Least Privilege |
Shared |
n/a |
Employ the least privilege principle when implementing information
system access. |
|
27 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_06 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_06 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 06 |
Identity & Access Management |
User Access Provisioning |
Shared |
n/a |
Define and implement a user access provisioning process which authorizes,
records, and communicates access changes to data and assets. |
|
24 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_07 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_07 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 07 |
Identity & Access Management |
User Access Changes and Revocation |
Shared |
n/a |
De-provision or respectively modify access of movers / leavers or
system identity changes in a timely manner in order to effectively adopt and
communicate identity and access management policies. |
|
56 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_10 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_10 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 10 |
Identity & Access Management |
Management of Privileged Access Roles |
Shared |
n/a |
Define and implement an access process to ensure privileged access
roles and rights are granted for a time limited period, and implement procedures
to prevent the culmination of segregated privileged access. |
|
56 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_13 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_13 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 13 |
Identity & Access Management |
Uniquely Identifiable Users |
Shared |
n/a |
Define, implement and evaluate processes, procedures and technical
measures that ensure users are identifiable through unique IDs or which can
associate individuals to the usage of user IDs. |
|
49 |
| CSA_v4.0.12 |
IAM_16 |
CSA_v4.0.12_IAM_16 |
CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.12 IAM 16 |
Identity & Access Management |
Authorization Mechanisms |
Shared |
n/a |
Define, implement and evaluate processes, procedures and technical
measures to verify access to data and system functions is authorized. |
|
46 |
| Cyber_Essentials_v3.1 |
2 |
Cyber_Essentials_v3.1_2 |
Cyber Essentials v3.1 2 |
Cyber Essentials |
Secure Configuration |
Shared |
n/a |
Aim: ensure that computers and network devices are properly configured to reduce vulnerabilities and provide only the services required to fulfill their role. |
|
61 |
| Cyber_Essentials_v3.1 |
4 |
Cyber_Essentials_v3.1_4 |
Cyber Essentials v3.1 4 |
Cyber Essentials |
User Access Control |
Shared |
n/a |
Aim: ensure that user accounts (1) are assigned to authorised individuals only, and (2) provide access to only those applications, computers and networks the user needs to carry out their role. |
|
74 |
| Cyber_Essentials_v3.1 |
5 |
Cyber_Essentials_v3.1_5 |
Cyber Essentials v3.1 5 |
Cyber Essentials |
Malware protection |
Shared |
n/a |
Aim: to restrict execution of known malware and untrusted software, from causing damage or accessing data. |
|
60 |
| EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022 |
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_21 |
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_21 |
EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 21 |
|
Cybersecurity risk-management measures |
Shared |
n/a |
Requires essential and important entities to take appropriate measures to manage cybersecurity risks. |
|
189 |
| EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. |
24 |
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._24 |
EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 24 |
Chapter 4 - Controller and processor |
Responsibility of the controller |
Shared |
n/a |
n/a |
|
306 |
| EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. |
25 |
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._25 |
EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 25 |
Chapter 4 - Controller and processor |
Data protection by design and by default |
Shared |
n/a |
n/a |
|
306 |
| EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. |
28 |
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._28 |
EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 28 |
Chapter 4 - Controller and processor |
Processor |
Shared |
n/a |
n/a |
|
306 |
| EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art. |
32 |
EU_GDPR_2016_679_Art._32 |
EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 Art. 32 |
Chapter 4 - Controller and processor |
Security of processing |
Shared |
n/a |
n/a |
|
306 |
| FBI_Criminal_Justice_Information_Services_v5.9.5_5 |
.1 |
FBI_Criminal_Justice_Information_Services_v5.9.5_5.1 |
FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) v5.9.5 5.1 |
Policy and Implementation - Systems And Communications Protection |
Systems And Communications Protection |
Shared |
In addition, applications, services, or information systems must have the capability to ensure system integrity through the detection and protection against unauthorized changes to software and information. |
Examples of systems and communications safeguards range from boundary and transmission protection to securing an agency's virtualized environment. |
|
110 |
| FBI_Criminal_Justice_Information_Services_v5.9.5_5 |
.5 |
FBI_Criminal_Justice_Information_Services_v5.9.5_5.5 |
FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) v5.9.5 5.5 |
Policy and Implementation - Access Control |
Access Control |
Shared |
Refer to Section 5.13.6 for additional access control requirements related to mobile devices used to access CJI. |
Access control provides the planning and implementation of mechanisms to restrict reading, writing, processing, and transmission of CJIS information and the modification of information systems, applications, services and communication configurations allowing access to CJIS information. |
|
97 |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
AC-4 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_AC-4 |
FedRAMP High AC-4 |
Access Control |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system enforces approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between interconnected systems based on [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies].
Supplemental Guidance: Information flow control regulates where information is allowed to travel within an information system and between information systems (as opposed to who is allowed to access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include, for example, keeping export-controlled information from being transmitted in the clear to the Internet, blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization, restricting web requests to the Internet that are not from the internal web proxy server, and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content. Transferring information between information systems representing different security domains with different security policies introduces risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners/stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes, for example: (i) prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing access only); (ii) employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows; and (iii) implementing trustworthy regarding mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels.
Organizations commonly employ information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of information between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within information systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on the characteristics of the information and/or the information path. Enforcement occurs, for example, in boundary protection devices (e.g., gateways, routers, guards, encrypted tunnels, firewalls) that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict information system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or message- filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering/inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement. Control enhancements 3 through 22 primarily address cross-domain solution needs which focus on more advanced filtering techniques, in-depth analysis, and stronger flow enforcement mechanisms implemented in cross-domain products, for example, high-assurance guards. Such capabilities are generally not available in commercial off-the-shelf information technology products. Related controls: AC-3, AC-17, AC-19, AC-21, CM-6, CM-7, SA-8, SC-2, SC-5, SC-7, SC-18.
References: None. |
link |
52 |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
SC-7 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_SC-7 |
FedRAMP High SC-7 |
System And Communications Protection |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system:
a. Monitors and controls communications at the external boundary of the system and at key internal boundaries within the system;
b. Implements subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are [Selection: physically; logically] separated from internal organizational networks; and
c. Connects to external networks or information systems only through managed interfaces consisting of boundary protection devices arranged in accordance with an organizational security architecture.
Supplemental Guidance: Managed interfaces include, for example, gateways, routers, firewalls, guards, network-based malicious code analysis and virtualization systems, or encrypted tunnels implemented within a security architecture (e.g., routers protecting firewalls or application gateways residing on protected subnetworks). Subnetworks that are physically or logically separated from internal networks are referred to as demilitarized zones or DMZs. Restricting or prohibiting interfaces within organizational information systems includes, for example, restricting external web traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces and prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses. Organizations consider the shared nature of commercial telecommunications services in the implementation of security controls associated with the use of such services. Commercial telecommunications services are commonly based on network components and consolidated management systems shared by all attached commercial customers, and may also include third party-provided access lines and other service elements. Such transmission services may represent sources of increased risk despite contract security provisions. Related controls: AC-4, AC-17, CA-3, CM-7, CP-8, IR-4, RA-3, SC-5, SC-13.
References: FIPS Publication 199; NIST Special Publications 800-41, 800-77. |
link |
52 |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
SC-7(3) |
FedRAMP_High_R4_SC-7(3) |
FedRAMP High SC-7 (3) |
System And Communications Protection |
Access Points |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization limits the number of external network connections to the information system.
Supplemental Guidance: Limiting the number of external network connections facilitates more comprehensive monitoring of inbound and outbound communications traffic. The Trusted Internet Connection (TIC) initiative is an example of limiting the number of external network connections. |
link |
51 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
AC-4 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_AC-4 |
FedRAMP Moderate AC-4 |
Access Control |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system enforces approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between interconnected systems based on [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies].
Supplemental Guidance: Information flow control regulates where information is allowed to travel within an information system and between information systems (as opposed to who is allowed to access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include, for example, keeping export-controlled information from being transmitted in the clear to the Internet, blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization, restricting web requests to the Internet that are not from the internal web proxy server, and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content. Transferring information between information systems representing different security domains with different security policies introduces risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners/stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes, for example: (i) prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing access only); (ii) employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows; and (iii) implementing trustworthy regarding mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels.
Organizations commonly employ information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of information between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within information systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on the characteristics of the information and/or the information path. Enforcement occurs, for example, in boundary protection devices (e.g., gateways, routers, guards, encrypted tunnels, firewalls) that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict information system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or message- filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering/inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement. Control enhancements 3 through 22 primarily address cross-domain solution needs which focus on more advanced filtering techniques, in-depth analysis, and stronger flow enforcement mechanisms implemented in cross-domain products, for example, high-assurance guards. Such capabilities are generally not available in commercial off-the-shelf information technology products. Related controls: AC-3, AC-17, AC-19, AC-21, CM-6, CM-7, SA-8, SC-2, SC-5, SC-7, SC-18.
References: None. |
link |
52 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
SC-7 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_SC-7 |
FedRAMP Moderate SC-7 |
System And Communications Protection |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system:
a. Monitors and controls communications at the external boundary of the system and at key internal boundaries within the system;
b. Implements subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are [Selection: physically; logically] separated from internal organizational networks; and
c. Connects to external networks or information systems only through managed interfaces consisting of boundary protection devices arranged in accordance with an organizational security architecture.
Supplemental Guidance: Managed interfaces include, for example, gateways, routers, firewalls, guards, network-based malicious code analysis and virtualization systems, or encrypted tunnels implemented within a security architecture (e.g., routers protecting firewalls or application gateways residing on protected subnetworks). Subnetworks that are physically or logically separated from internal networks are referred to as demilitarized zones or DMZs. Restricting or prohibiting interfaces within organizational information systems includes, for example, restricting external web traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces and prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses. Organizations consider the shared nature of commercial telecommunications services in the implementation of security controls associated with the use of such services. Commercial telecommunications services are commonly based on network components and consolidated management systems shared by all attached commercial customers, and may also include third party-provided access lines and other service elements. Such transmission services may represent sources of increased risk despite contract security provisions. Related controls: AC-4, AC-17, CA-3, CM-7, CP-8, IR-4, RA-3, SC-5, SC-13.
References: FIPS Publication 199; NIST Special Publications 800-41, 800-77. |
link |
52 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
SC-7(3) |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_SC-7(3) |
FedRAMP Moderate SC-7 (3) |
System And Communications Protection |
Access Points |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization limits the number of external network connections to the information system.
Supplemental Guidance: Limiting the number of external network connections facilitates more comprehensive monitoring of inbound and outbound communications traffic. The Trusted Internet Connection (TIC) initiative is an example of limiting the number of external network connections. |
link |
51 |
| FFIEC_CAT_2017 |
3.1.1 |
FFIEC_CAT_2017_3.1.1 |
FFIEC CAT 2017 3.1.1 |
Cybersecurity Controls |
Infrastructure Management |
Shared |
n/a |
- Network perimeter defense tools (e.g., border router and firewall) are used.
- Systems that are accessed from the Internet or by external parties are protected by firewalls or other similar devices.
- All ports are monitored.
- Up to date antivirus and anti-malware tools are used.
- Systems configurations (for servers, desktops, routers, etc.) follow industry standards and are enforced.
- Ports, functions, protocols and services are prohibited if no longer needed for business purposes.
- Access to make changes to systems configurations (including virtual machines and hypervisors) is controlled and monitored.
- Programs that can override system, object, network, virtual machine, and application controls are restricted.
- System sessions are locked after a pre-defined period of inactivity and are terminated after pre-defined conditions are met.
- Wireless network environments require security settings with strong encryption for authentication and transmission. (*N/A if there are no wireless networks.) |
|
71 |
| FFIEC_CAT_2017 |
3.1.2 |
FFIEC_CAT_2017_3.1.2 |
FFIEC CAT 2017 3.1.2 |
Cybersecurity Controls |
Access and Data Management |
Shared |
n/a |
Employee access is granted to systems and confidential data based on job responsibilities and the principles of least privilege.'FFIEC_Cybersecurity Control'!F8
- Employee access to systems and confidential data provides for separation of duties.
- Elevated privileges (e.g., administrator privileges) are limited and tightly controlled (e.g., assigned to individuals, not shared, and require stronger 'FFIEC_Cybersecurity Control'!F7password controls).
- User access reviews are performed periodically for all systems and applications based on the risk to the application or system.
- Changes to physical and logical user access, including those that result from voluntary and involuntary terminations, are submitted to and approved by appropriate personnel.
- Identification and authentication are required and managed for access to systems, applications, and hardware.
- Access controls include password complexity and limits to password attempts and reuse.
- All default passwords and unnecessary default accounts are changed before system implementation.
- Customer access to Internet-based products or services requires authentication controls (e.g., layered controls, multifactor) that are commensurate with the risk.
- Production and non-production environments are segregated to prevent unauthorized access or changes to information assets. (*N/A if no production environment exists at the institution or the institution’s third party.)
- Physical security controls are used to prevent unauthorized access to information systems and telecommunication systems.
- All passwords are encrypted in storage and in transit.
- Confidential data are encrypted when transmitted across public or untrusted networks (e.g., Internet).
- Mobile devices (e.g., laptops, tablets, and removable media) are encrypted if used to store confidential data. (*N/A if mobile devices are not used.)
- Remote access to critical systems by employees, contractors, and third parties uses encrypted connections and multifactor authentication.
- Administrative, physical, or technical controls are in place to prevent users without administrative responsibilities from installing unauthorized software.
- Customer service (e.g., the call center) utilizes formal procedures to authenticate customers commensurate with the risk of the transaction or request.
- Data is disposed of or destroyed according to documented requirements and within expected time frames. |
|
59 |
| FFIEC_CAT_2017 |
4.1.1 |
FFIEC_CAT_2017_4.1.1 |
FFIEC CAT 2017 4.1.1 |
External Dependency Management |
Connections |
Shared |
n/a |
- The critical business processes that are dependent on external connectivity have been identified.
- The institution ensures that third-party connections are authorized.
- A network diagram is in place and identifies all external connections.
- Data flow diagrams are in place and document information flow to external parties. |
|
43 |
| HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 |
01.c |
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_01.c |
HITRUST CSF v11.3 01.c |
Authorized Access to Information Systems |
Control privileged access to information systems and services. |
Shared |
1. Privileged role assignments to be automatically tracked and monitored.
2. Role-based access controls to be implemented and should be capable of mapping each user to one or more roles, and each role to one or more system functions.
3. Critical security functions to be executable only after granting of explicit authorization. |
The allocation and use of privileges to information systems and services shall be restricted and controlled. Special attention shall be given to the allocation of privileged access rights, which allow users to override system controls. |
|
44 |
| HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 |
01.m |
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_01.m |
HITRUST CSF v11.3 01.m |
Network Access Control |
Ensure segregation in networks. |
Shared |
Security gateways, internal network perimeters, wireless network segregation, firewalls, and logical network domains with controlled data flows to be implemented to enhance network security. |
Groups of information services, users, and information systems should be segregated on networks. |
|
48 |
| HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 |
01.n |
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_01.n |
HITRUST CSF v11.3 01.n |
Network Access Control |
Prevent unauthorised access to shared networks. |
Shared |
Default deny policy at managed interfaces, restricted user connections through network gateways, comprehensive access controls, time-based restrictions, and encryption of sensitive information transmitted over public networks for is to be implemented for enhanced security. |
For shared networks, especially those extending across the organization’s boundaries, the capability of users to connect to the network shall be restricted, in line with the access control policy and requirements of the business applications. |
|
55 |
| HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 |
01.o |
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_01.o |
HITRUST CSF v11.3 01.o |
Network Access Control |
Implement network routing controls to prevent breach of the access control policy of business applications. |
Shared |
Security gateways are to be leveraged, application-layer filtering proxy is to be employed, outbound traffic is to be directed through authenticated proxy servers, and internal directory services to fortify network access controls and protect against external threats are to be secured. |
Routing controls shall be implemented for networks to ensure that computer connections and information flows do not breach the access control policy of the business applications. |
|
33 |
| HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 |
09.ab |
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_09.ab |
HITRUST CSF v11.3 09.ab |
Monitoring |
Establish procedures for monitoring use of information processing systems and facilities to check for use and effectiveness of implemented controls. |
Shared |
1. It is to be specified how often audit logs are reviewed, how the reviews are documented, and the specific roles and responsibilities of the personnel conducting the reviews, including the professional certifications or other qualifications required.
2. All relevant legal requirements applicable to its monitoring of authorized access and unauthorized access attempts is to be complied with. |
Procedures for monitoring use of information processing systems and facilities shall be established to check for use and effectiveness of implemented controls. The results of the monitoring activities shall be reviewed regularly. |
|
109 |
| HITRUST_CSF_v11.3 |
09.w |
HITRUST_CSF_v11.3_09.w |
HITRUST CSF v11.3 09.w |
Exchange of Information |
Develop and implement policies and procedures, to protect information associated with the interconnection of business information systems. |
Shared |
1. A security baseline is to be documented and implemented for interconnected systems.
2. Other requirements and controls linked to interconnected business systems are to include the separation of operational systems from interconnected system, retention and back-up of information held on the system, and fallback requirements and arrangements. |
Policies and procedures shall be developed and implemented to protect information associated with the interconnection of business information systems. |
|
45 |
| ISO_IEC_27002_2022 |
5.14 |
ISO_IEC_27002_2022_5.14 |
ISO IEC 27002 2022 5.14 |
Protection,
Preventive Control |
Information transfer |
Shared |
To maintain the security of information transferred within an organization and with any external interested party. |
Information transfer rules, procedures, or agreements should be in place for all types of transfer facilities within the organization and between the organization and other parties. |
|
46 |
| ISO_IEC_27002_2022 |
8.2 |
ISO_IEC_27002_2022_8.2 |
ISO IEC 27002 2022 8.2 |
Protection,
Preventive, Control |
Privileged access rights |
Shared |
The allocation and use of privileged access rights should be restricted and managed.
|
To ensure only authorized users, software components and services are provided with privileged access rights. |
|
29 |
| ISO_IEC_27017_2015 |
12.4.3 |
ISO_IEC_27017_2015_12.4.3 |
ISO IEC 27017 2015 12.4.3 |
Operations Security |
Administrator and Operation Logs |
Shared |
For Cloud Service Customer:
If a privileged operation is delegated to the cloud service customer, the operation and performance of those operations should be logged. The cloud service customer should determine whether logging capabilities provided by the cloud service provider are appropriate or whether the cloud service customer should implement additional logging capabilities. |
To log operation and performance of those operations wherein rivileged operation is delegated to the cloud service customer. |
|
28 |
| K_ISMS_P_2018 |
2.10.1 |
K_ISMS_P_2018_2.10.1 |
K ISMS P 2018 2.10.1 |
2.10 |
Establish Procedures for Managing the Security of System Operations |
Shared |
n/a |
Establish and implement operating procedures for managing the security of system operations such as designating system administrators, updating policies, changing rulesets, monitoring events, managing policy implementations or exceptions. |
|
408 |
| K_ISMS_P_2018 |
2.10.2 |
K_ISMS_P_2018_2.10.2 |
K ISMS P 2018 2.10.2 |
2.10 |
Establish Protective Measures for Administrator Privileges and Security Configurations |
Shared |
n/a |
Establish and implement protective measures with regard to administrator privileges and security configurations to ensure that important information and personal information are not exposed as a result of unauthorized access by service type or misconfigurations. |
|
385 |
| K_ISMS_P_2018 |
2.6.1 |
K_ISMS_P_2018_2.6.1 |
K ISMS P 2018 2.6.1 |
2.6 |
Establish Network Management Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
Establish and implement network management procedures such as IP management, terminal authentication, and network segregation according to business purpose and criticality. |
|
20 |
| K_ISMS_P_2018 |
2.6.6 |
K_ISMS_P_2018_2.6.6 |
K ISMS P 2018 2.6.6 |
2.6 |
Prohibit Information Use and Processing Outside of Protected Areas |
Shared |
n/a |
Prohibit the use of information systems and the processing of personal information outside protected areas. If remote access is permitted, establish and implement appropriate protective measures. |
|
55 |
|
mp.com.1 Secure perimeter |
mp.com.1 Secure perimeter |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
49 |
| New_Zealand_ISM |
18.1.13.C.02 |
New_Zealand_ISM_18.1.13.C.02 |
New_Zealand_ISM_18.1.13.C.02 |
18. Network security |
18.1.13.C.02 Limiting network access |
|
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD implement network access controls on all networks. |
|
19 |
| NIST_CSF_v2.0 |
PR.AA_05 |
NIST_CSF_v2.0_PR.AA_05 |
NIST CSF v2.0 PR.AA 05 |
PROTECT- Identity Management, Authentication, and Access |
Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties. |
Shared |
n/a |
To implement safeguards for managing organization’s cybersecurity risks. |
|
29 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.1.3 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.1.3 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.1.3 |
Access Control |
Control the flow of CUI in accordance with approved authorizations. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Information flow control regulates where information can travel within a system and between systems (versus who can access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include the following: keeping export-controlled information from being transmitted in the clear to the Internet; blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization; restricting requests to the Internet that are not from the internal web proxy server; and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content. Organizations commonly use information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of information between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on characteristics of the information or the information path. Enforcement occurs in boundary protection devices (e.g., gateways, routers, guards, encrypted tunnels, firewalls) that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or message-filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering and inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement. Transferring information between systems representing different security domains with different security policies introduces risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners or stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes: prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing access only); employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows; and implementing trustworthy regrading mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels. |
link |
56 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.13.1 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.13.1 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.13.1 |
System and Communications Protection |
Monitor, control, and protect communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of organizational systems. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Communications can be monitored, controlled, and protected at boundary components and by restricting or prohibiting interfaces in organizational systems. Boundary components include gateways, routers, firewalls, guards, network-based malicious code analysis and virtualization systems, or encrypted tunnels implemented within a system security architecture (e.g., routers protecting firewalls or application gateways residing on protected subnetworks). Restricting or prohibiting interfaces in organizational systems includes restricting external web communications traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces and prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses. Organizations consider the shared nature of commercial telecommunications services in the implementation of security requirements associated with the use of such services. Commercial telecommunications services are commonly based on network components and consolidated management systems shared by all attached commercial customers and may also include third party-provided access lines and other service elements. Such transmission services may represent sources of increased risk despite contract security provisions. [SP 800-41] provides guidance on firewalls and firewall policy. [SP 800-125B] provides guidance on security for virtualization technologies.
[28] There is no prescribed format or specified level of detail for system security plans. However, organizations ensure that the required information in 3.12.4 is conveyed in those plans. |
link |
51 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.13.2 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.13.2 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.13.2 |
System and Communications Protection |
Employ architectural designs, software development techniques, and systems engineering principles that promote effective information security within organizational systems. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Organizations apply systems security engineering principles to new development systems or systems undergoing major upgrades. For legacy systems, organizations apply systems security engineering principles to system upgrades and modifications to the extent feasible, given the current state of hardware, software, and firmware components within those systems. The application of systems security engineering concepts and principles helps to develop trustworthy, secure, and resilient systems and system components and reduce the susceptibility of organizations to disruptions, hazards, and threats. Examples of these concepts and principles include developing layered protections; establishing security policies, architecture, and controls as the foundation for design; incorporating security requirements into the system development life cycle; delineating physical and logical security boundaries; ensuring that developers are trained on how to build secure software; and performing threat modeling to identify use cases, threat agents, attack vectors and patterns, design patterns, and compensating controls needed to mitigate risk. Organizations that apply security engineering concepts and principles can facilitate the development of trustworthy, secure systems, system components, and system services; reduce risk to acceptable levels; and make informed risk-management decisions. [SP 800-160-1] provides guidance on systems security engineering. |
link |
51 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.13.5 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.13.5 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.13.5 |
System and Communications Protection |
Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are physically or logically separated from internal networks. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Subnetworks that are physically or logically separated from internal networks are referred to as demilitarized zones (DMZs). DMZs are typically implemented with boundary control devices and techniques that include routers, gateways, firewalls, virtualization, or cloud-based technologies. [SP 800-41] provides guidance on firewalls and firewall policy. [SP 800-125B] provides guidance on security for virtualization technologies |
link |
51 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.13.6 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.13.6 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.13.6 |
System and Communications Protection |
Deny network communications traffic by default and allow network communications traffic by exception (i.e., deny all, permit by exception). |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
This requirement applies to inbound and outbound network communications traffic at the system boundary and at identified points within the system. A deny-all, permit-by-exception network communications traffic policy ensures that only those connections which are essential and approved are allowed. |
link |
22 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 |
.1.2 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.1.2 |
NIST 800-171 R3 3.1.2 |
Access Control |
Access Enforcement |
Shared |
Access control policies control access between active entities or subjects (i.e., users or system processes acting on behalf of users) and passive entities or objects (i.e., devices, files, records, domains) in organizational systems. Types of system access include remote access and access to systems that communicate through external networks, such as the internet. Access enforcement mechanisms can also be employed at the application and service levels to provide increased protection for CUI. This recognizes that the system can host many applications and services in support of mission and business functions. |
Enforce approved authorizations for logical access to CUI and system resources. |
|
38 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 |
.1.3 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.1.3 |
NIST 800-171 R3 3.1.3 |
Access Control |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Shared |
Information flow control regulates where CUI can transit within a system and between systems (versus who can access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include keeping CUI from being transmitted in the clear to the internet, blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization, restricting requests to the internet that are not from the internal web proxy server, and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content.
Organizations commonly use information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of CUI between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on characteristics of the information or the information path. Enforcement occurs in boundary protection devices (e.g., encrypted tunnels, routers, gateways, and firewalls) that use rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or provide a message-filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also
consider the trustworthiness of filtering and inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and
software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement.
Transferring information between systems that represent different security domains with different security policies introduces the risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners or stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing information access only), employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows, and implementing trustworthy regrading mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels. |
Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI within the system and between connected systems. |
|
46 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 |
.12.5 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.12.5 |
NIST 800-171 R3 3.12.5 |
Security Assessment Control |
Information Exchange |
Shared |
The types of agreements selected are based on factors such as the relationship between the organizations exchanging information (e.g., government to government, government to business, business to business, government or business to service provider, government or business to individual) and the level of access to the organizational system by users of the other system. Types of agreements can include interconnection security agreements, information exchange security agreements, memoranda of understanding or agreement, service-level agreements, or other types of agreements. Organizations may incorporate agreement information into formal contracts, especially for information exchanges established between federal agencies and nonfederal organizations (e.g., service providers, contractors, system developers, and system integrators). Examples of the types of information contained in exchange agreements include the interface characteristics, security requirements, controls, and responsibilities for each system. |
a. Approve and manage the exchange of CUI between the system and other systems using [Selection (one or more): interconnection security agreements; information exchange security agreements; memoranda of understanding or agreement; service level agreements; user agreements; nondisclosure agreements].
b. Document, as part of the exchange agreements, interface characteristics, security requirements, and responsibilities for each system.
c. Review and update the exchange agreements periodically. |
|
25 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 |
.13.1 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.13.1 |
NIST 800-171 R3 3.13.1 |
System and Communications Protection Control |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
Managed interfaces include gateways, routers, firewalls, network-based malicious code analysis, virtualization systems, and encrypted tunnels implemented within a security architecture. Subnetworks that are either physically or logically separated from internal networks are referred to as demilitarized zones or DMZs. Restricting or prohibiting interfaces within organizational systems includes restricting external web traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces, prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses, and prohibiting internal traffic that appears to be spoofing external addresses. |
a. Monitor and control communications at the external managed interfaces to the system and at key internal managed interfaces within the system.
b. Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are physically or logically separated from internal networks.
c. Connect to external systems only through managed interfaces consisting of boundary protection devices arranged in accordance with an organizational security architecture. |
|
43 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 |
.5.5 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.5.5 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
43 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
AC-4 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_AC-4 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 AC-4 |
Access Control |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system enforces approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between interconnected systems based on [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies].
Supplemental Guidance: Information flow control regulates where information is allowed to travel within an information system and between information systems (as opposed to who is allowed to access the information) and without explicit regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include, for example, keeping export-controlled information from being transmitted in the clear to the Internet, blocking outside traffic that claims to be from within the organization, restricting web requests to the Internet that are not from the internal web proxy server, and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content. Transferring information between information systems representing different security domains with different security policies introduces risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security policies. In such situations, information owners/stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between interconnected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions when required to enforce specific security policies. Enforcement includes, for example: (i) prohibiting information transfers between interconnected systems (i.e., allowing access only); (ii) employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows; and (iii) implementing trustworthy regarding mechanisms to reassign security attributes and security labels.
Organizations commonly employ information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of information between designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) within information systems and between interconnected systems. Flow control is based on the characteristics of the information and/or the information path. Enforcement occurs, for example, in boundary protection devices (e.g., gateways, routers, guards, encrypted tunnels, firewalls) that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict information system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or message- filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering/inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement. Control enhancements 3 through 22 primarily address cross-domain solution needs which focus on more advanced filtering techniques, in-depth analysis, and stronger flow enforcement mechanisms implemented in cross-domain products, for example, high-assurance guards. Such capabilities are generally not available in commercial off-the-shelf information technology products. Related controls: AC-3, AC-17, AC-19, AC-21, CM-6, CM-7, SA-8, SC-2, SC-5, SC-7, SC-18.
References: None. |
link |
52 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
SC-7 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_SC-7 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 SC-7 |
System And Communications Protection |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
The information system:
a. Monitors and controls communications at the external boundary of the system and at key internal boundaries within the system;
b. Implements subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are [Selection: physically; logically] separated from internal organizational networks; and
c. Connects to external networks or information systems only through managed interfaces consisting of boundary protection devices arranged in accordance with an organizational security architecture.
Supplemental Guidance: Managed interfaces include, for example, gateways, routers, firewalls, guards, network-based malicious code analysis and virtualization systems, or encrypted tunnels implemented within a security architecture (e.g., routers protecting firewalls or application gateways residing on protected subnetworks). Subnetworks that are physically or logically separated from internal networks are referred to as demilitarized zones or DMZs. Restricting or prohibiting interfaces within organizational information systems includes, for example, restricting external web traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces and prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses. Organizations consider the shared nature of commercial telecommunications services in the implementation of security controls associated with the use of such services. Commercial telecommunications services are commonly based on network components and consolidated management systems shared by all attached commercial customers, and may also include third party-provided access lines and other service elements. Such transmission services may represent sources of increased risk despite contract security provisions. Related controls: AC-4, AC-17, CA-3, CM-7, CP-8, IR-4, RA-3, SC-5, SC-13.
References: FIPS Publication 199; NIST Special Publications 800-41, 800-77. |
link |
52 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
SC-7(3) |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_SC-7(3) |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 SC-7 (3) |
System And Communications Protection |
Access Points |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization limits the number of external network connections to the information system.
Supplemental Guidance: Limiting the number of external network connections facilitates more comprehensive monitoring of inbound and outbound communications traffic. The Trusted Internet Connection (TIC) initiative is an example of limiting the number of external network connections. |
link |
51 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1 |
AC.3 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1_AC.3 |
NIST SP 800-53 R5.1.1 AC.3 |
Access Control |
Access Enforcement |
Shared |
Enforce approved authorizations for logical access to information and system resources in accordance with applicable access control policies. |
Access control policies control access between active entities or subjects (i.e., users or processes acting on behalf of users) and passive entities or objects (i.e., devices, files, records, domains) in organizational systems. In addition to enforcing authorized access at the system level and recognizing that systems can host many applications and services in support of mission and business functions, access enforcement mechanisms can also be employed at the application and service level to provide increased information security and privacy. In contrast to logical access controls that are implemented within the system, physical access controls are addressed by the controls in the Physical and Environmental Protection (PE) family. |
|
22 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1 |
AC.4 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1_AC.4 |
NIST SP 800-53 R5.1.1 AC.4 |
Access Control |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Shared |
Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between connected systems based on [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies]. |
Information flow control regulates where information can travel within a system and between systems (in contrast to who is allowed to access the information) and without regard to subsequent accesses to that information. Flow control restrictions include blocking external traffic that claims to be from within the organization, keeping export-controlled information from being transmitted in the clear to the Internet, restricting web requests that are not from the internal web proxy server, and limiting information transfers between organizations based on data structures and content. Transferring information between organizations may require an agreement specifying how the information flow is enforced (see CA-3). Transferring information between systems in different security or privacy domains with different security or privacy policies introduces the risk that such transfers violate one or more domain security or privacy policies. In such situations, information owners/stewards provide guidance at designated policy enforcement points between connected systems. Organizations consider mandating specific architectural solutions to enforce specific security and privacy policies. Enforcement includes prohibiting information transfers between connected systems (i.e., allowing access only), verifying write permissions before accepting information from another security or privacy domain or connected system, employing hardware mechanisms to enforce one-way information flows, and implementing trustworthy regrading mechanisms to reassign security or privacy attributes and labels.
Organizations commonly employ information flow control policies and enforcement mechanisms to control the flow of information between designated sources and destinations within systems and between connected systems. Flow control is based on the characteristics of the information and/or the information path. Enforcement occurs, for example, in boundary protection devices that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict system services, provide a packet-filtering capability based on header information, or provide a message-filtering capability based on message content. Organizations also consider the trustworthiness of filtering and/or inspection mechanisms (i.e., hardware, firmware, and software components) that are critical to information flow enforcement. Control enhancements 3 through 32 primarily address cross-domain solution needs that focus on more advanced filtering techniques, in-depth analysis, and stronger flow enforcement mechanisms implemented in cross-domain products, such as high-assurance guards. Such capabilities are generally not available in commercial off-the-shelf products. Information flow enforcement also applies to control plane traffic (e.g., routing and DNS). |
|
44 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1 |
AC.6 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1_AC.6 |
NIST SP 800-53 R5.1.1 AC.6 |
Access Control |
Least Privilege |
Shared |
Employ the principle of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses for users (or processes acting on behalf of users) that are necessary to accomplish assigned organizational tasks. |
Organizations employ least privilege for specific duties and systems. The principle of least privilege is also applied to system processes, ensuring that the processes have access to systems and operate at privilege levels no higher than necessary to accomplish organizational missions or business functions. Organizations consider the creation of additional processes, roles, and accounts as necessary to achieve least privilege. Organizations apply least privilege to the development, implementation, and operation of organizational systems. |
|
25 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1 |
SC.7 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5.1.1_SC.7 |
NIST SP 800-53 R5.1.1 SC.7 |
System and Communications Protection |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
a. Monitor and control communications at the external managed interfaces to the system and at key internal managed interfaces within the system;
b. Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are [Selection: physically; logically] separated from internal organizational networks; and
c. Connect to external networks or systems only through managed interfaces consisting of boundary protection devices arranged in accordance with an organizational security and privacy architecture. |
Managed interfaces include gateways, routers, firewalls, guards, network-based malicious code analysis, virtualization systems, or encrypted tunnels implemented within a security architecture. Subnetworks that are physically or logically separated from internal networks are referred to as demilitarized zones or DMZs. Restricting or prohibiting interfaces within organizational systems includes restricting external web traffic to designated web servers within managed interfaces, prohibiting external traffic that appears to be spoofing internal addresses, and prohibiting internal traffic that appears to be spoofing external addresses. Commercial telecommunications services are provided by network components and consolidated management systems shared by customers. These services may also include third party-provided access lines and other service elements. Such services may represent sources of increased risk despite contract security provisions. Boundary protection may be implemented as a common control for all or part of an organizational network such that the boundary to be protected is greater than a system-specific boundary (i.e., an authorization boundary). |
|
43 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
AC-4 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_AC-4 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 AC-4 |
Access Control |
Information Flow Enforcement |
Shared |
n/a |
Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between connected systems based on [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies]. |
link |
52 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
SC-7 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_SC-7 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7 |
System and Communications Protection |
Boundary Protection |
Shared |
n/a |
a. Monitor and control communications at the external managed interfaces to the system and at key internal managed interfaces within the system;
b. Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are [Selection: physically;logically] separated from internal organizational networks; and
c. Connect to external networks or systems only through managed interfaces consisting of boundary protection devices arranged in accordance with an organizational security and privacy architecture. |
link |
52 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
SC-7(3) |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_SC-7(3) |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7 (3) |
System and Communications Protection |
Access Points |
Shared |
n/a |
Limit the number of external network connections to the system. |
link |
51 |
| NZ_ISM_v3.5 |
GS-2 |
NZ_ISM_v3.5_GS-2 |
NZISM Security Benchmark GS-2 |
Gateway security |
19.1.11 Using Gateways |
Customer |
n/a |
Physically locating all gateway components inside a secure server room will reduce the risk of unauthorised access to the device(s).
The system owner of the higher security domain of connected security domains would be most familiar with the controls required to protect the more sensitive information and as such is best placed to manage any shared components of gateways. In some cases where multiple security domains from different agencies are connected to a gateway, it may be more appropriate to have a qualified third party manage the gateway on behalf of all connected agencies.
Gateway components may also reside in a virtual environment ??? refer to Section 22.2 ??? Virtualisation and Section 22.3 ??? Virtual Local Area Networks |
link |
10 |
| NZISM_Security_Benchmark_v1.1 |
GS-2 |
NZISM_Security_Benchmark_v1.1_GS-2 |
NZISM Security Benchmark GS-2 |
Gateway security |
19.1.11 Using Gateways |
Customer |
Agencies MUST ensure that:
all agency networks are protected from networks in other security domains by one or more gateways;
all gateways contain mechanisms to filter or limit data flow at the network and content level to only the information necessary for business purposes; and
all gateway components, discrete and virtual, are physically located within an appropriately secured server room. |
Physically locating all gateway components inside a secure server room will reduce the risk of unauthorised access to the device(s).
The system owner of the higher security domain of connected security domains would be most familiar with the controls required to protect the more sensitive information and as such is best placed to manage any shared components of gateways. In some cases where multiple security domains from different agencies are connected to a gateway, it may be more appropriate to have a qualified third party manage the gateway on behalf of all connected agencies.
Gateway components may also reside in a virtual environment – refer to Section 22.2 – Virtualisation and Section 22.3 – Virtual Local Area Networks |
link |
8 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
14.1.10.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_14.1.10.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 14.1.10.C.01. |
Standard Operating Environments |
14.1.10.C.01. - reduce potential vulnerabilities. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies MUST reduce potential vulnerabilities in their SOEs by:
1. removing unused accounts;
2. renaming or deleting default accounts; and
3. replacing default passwords before or during the installation process. |
|
39 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
14.1.10.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_14.1.10.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 14.1.10.C.02. |
Standard Operating Environments |
14.1.10.C.02. - reduce potential vulnerabilities. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD reduce potential vulnerabilities in their SOEs by:
1. removing unused accounts;
2. renaming or deleting default accounts; and
3. replacing default passwords, before or during the installation process. |
|
39 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
14.3.12.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_14.3.12.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 14.3.12.C.01. |
Web Applications |
14.3.12.C.01. - strengthening the overall security posture of the agency's network environment. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD use the Web proxy to filter content that is potentially harmful to system users and their workstations. |
|
77 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
16.1.33.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_16.1.33.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 16.1.33.C.01. |
Identification, Authentication and Passwords |
16.1.33.C.01. - promote security and accountability within the agency's systems. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies MUST NOT use shared credentials to access accounts. |
|
25 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
16.1.33.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_16.1.33.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 16.1.33.C.02. |
Identification, Authentication and Passwords |
16.1.33.C.02. - promote security and accountability within the agency's systems. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD NOT use shared credentials to access accounts. |
|
25 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
16.1.34.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_16.1.34.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 16.1.34.C.01. |
Identification, Authentication and Passwords |
16.1.34.C.01. - promote security and accountability within the agency's systems. |
Shared |
n/a |
If agencies choose to allow shared, non user-specific accounts they MUST ensure that an independent means of determining the identification of the system user is implemented. |
|
25 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
16.1.35.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_16.1.35.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 16.1.35.C.02. |
Identification, Authentication and Passwords |
16.1.35.C.02. - implement additional authentication factors to enhance security.
|
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD ensure that they combine the use of multiple methods when identifying and authenticating system users. |
|
25 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
16.1.47.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_16.1.47.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 16.1.47.C.01. |
Identification, Authentication and Passwords |
16.1.47.C.01. - enhance overall security posture. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD ensure that repeated account lockouts are investigated before reauthorising access. |
|
39 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
17.5.7.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_17.5.7.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 17.5.7.C.01. |
Secure Shell |
17.5.7.C.01. - enhance overall cybersecurity posture. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD use public key-based authentication before using password-based authentication. |
|
37 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
17.5.7.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_17.5.7.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 17.5.7.C.02. |
Secure Shell |
17.5.7.C.02. - enhance overall cybersecurity posture. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies that allow password authentication SHOULD use techniques to block brute force attacks against the password. |
|
41 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
20.4.4.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_20.4.4.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 20.4.4.C.01. |
Databases |
20.4.4.C.01. - enhance data security and integrity. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies MUST protect database files from access that bypasses the database's normal access controls. |
|
23 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
20.4.4.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_20.4.4.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 20.4.4.C.02. |
Databases |
20.4.4.C.02. - enhance data security and integrity. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD protect database files from access that bypass normal access controls. |
|
23 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
20.4.5.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_20.4.5.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 20.4.5.C.01. |
Databases |
20.4.5.C.01. - enhance data security and integrity. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies MUST enable logging and auditing of system users' actions. |
|
22 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
20.4.5.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_20.4.5.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 20.4.5.C.02. |
Databases |
20.4.5.C.02. - bolster data security and compliance measures. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD ensure that databases provide functionality to allow for auditing of system users' actions. |
|
22 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
20.4.6.C.01. |
NZISM_v3.7_20.4.6.C.01. |
NZISM v3.7 20.4.6.C.01. |
Databases |
20.4.6.C.01. - mitigate the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive information and ensuring compliance with security clearance requirements. |
Shared |
n/a |
If results from database queries cannot be appropriately filtered, agencies MUST ensure that all query results are appropriately sanitised to meet the minimum security clearances of system users. |
|
22 |
| NZISM_v3.7 |
20.4.6.C.02. |
NZISM_v3.7_20.4.6.C.02. |
NZISM v3.7 20.4.6.C.02. |
Databases |
20.4.6.C.02. - enhance data security. |
Shared |
n/a |
Agencies SHOULD ensure that system users who do not have sufficient security clearances to view database contents cannot see or interrogate associated metadata in a list of results from a search engine query. |
|
22 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
1.4.4 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_1.4.4 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 1.4.4 |
Install and Maintain Network Security Controls |
System components that store cardholder data are not directly accessible from untrusted networks |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine the data-flow diagram and network diagram to verify that it is documented that system components storing cardholder data are not directly accessible from the untrusted networks. Examine configurations of NSCs to verify that controls are implemented such that system components storing cardholder data are not directly accessible from untrusted networks |
|
43 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.1 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.1 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.1 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
An access control model is defined and includes granting access as follows: Appropriate access depending on the entity’s business and access needs. Access to system components and data resources that is based on users’ job classification and functions. The least privileges required (for example, user, administrator) to perform a job function |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine documented policies and procedures and interview personnel to verify the access control model is defined in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Examine access control model settings and verify that access needs are appropriately defined in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement |
|
43 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.2 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.2 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.2 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
Access is assigned to users, including privileged users, based on: Job classification and function. Least privileges necessary to perform job responsibilities |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine policies and procedures to verify they cover assigning access to users in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Examine user access settings, including for privileged users, and interview responsible management personnel to verify that privileges assigned are in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Interview personnel responsible for assigning access to verify that privileged user access is assigned in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement |
|
43 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.3 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.3 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.3 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
Required privileges are approved by authorized personnel |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine policies and procedures to verify they define processes for approval of all privileges by authorized personnel. Examine user IDs and assigned privileges, and compare with documented approvals to verify that: Documented approval exists for the assigned privileges. The approval was by authorized personnel. Specified privileges match the roles assigned to the individual |
|
38 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.4 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.4 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.4 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
All user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, are reviewed as follows: At least once every six months. To ensure user accounts and access remain appropriate based on job function. Any inappropriate access is addressed. Management acknowledges that access remains appropriate |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine policies and procedures to verify they define processes to review all user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Interview responsible personnel and examine documented results of periodic reviews of user accounts to verify that all the results are in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement |
|
40 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.5 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.5 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.5 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
All application and system accounts and related access privileges are assigned and managed as follows: Based on the least privileges necessary for the operability of the system or application. Access is limited to the systems, applications, or processes that specifically require their use |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine policies and procedures to verify they define processes to manage and assign application and system accounts and related access privileges in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Examine privileges associated with system and application accounts and interview responsible personnel to verify that application and system accounts and related access privileges are assigned and managed in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement |
|
44 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.5.1 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.5.1 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.5.1 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
All access by application and system accounts and related access privileges are reviewed as follows: Periodically (at the frequency defined in the entity’s targeted risk analysis, which is performed according to all elements specified in Requirement 12.3.1). The application/system access remains appropriate for the function being performed. Any inappropriate access is addressed. Management acknowledges that access remains appropriate |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine policies and procedures to verify they define processes to review all application and system accounts and related access privileges in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Examine the entity’s targeted risk analysis for the frequency of periodic reviews of application and system accounts and related access privileges to verify the risk analysis was performed in accordance with all elements specified in Requirement 12.3.1. Interview responsible personnel and examine documented results of periodic reviews of system and application accounts and related privileges to verify that the reviews occur in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement |
|
39 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.2.6 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.2.6 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.2.6 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
All user access to query repositories of stored cardholder data is restricted as follows: Via applications or other programmatic methods, with access and allowed actions based on user roles and least privileges. Only the responsible administrator(s) can directly access or query repositories of stored CHD |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine policies and procedures and interview personnel to verify processes are defined for granting user access to query repositories of stored cardholder data, in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement. Examine configuration settings for querying repositories of stored cardholder data to verify they are in accordance with all elements specified in this requirement |
|
41 |
| PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 |
7.3.1 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_7.3.1 |
PCI DSS v4.0.1 7.3.1 |
Restrict Access to System Components and Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know |
An access control system(s) is in place that restricts access based on a user’s need to know and covers all system components |
Shared |
n/a |
Examine vendor documentation and system settings to verify that access is managed for each system component via an access control system(s) that restricts access based on a user’s need to know and covers all system components |
|
27 |
| RBI_CSF_Banks_v2016 |
14.1 |
RBI_CSF_Banks_v2016_14.1 |
|
Anti-Phishing |
Anti-Phishing-14.1 |
|
n/a |
Subscribe to Anti-phishing/anti-rouge app services from external service providers for identifying and taking down phishing websites/rouge applications. |
|
28 |
| RBI_CSF_Banks_v2016 |
7.7 |
RBI_CSF_Banks_v2016_7.7 |
|
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.7 |
|
n/a |
Periodically evaluate the access device configurations and patch levels to ensure
that all access points, nodes between (i) different VLANs in the Data Centre (ii)
LAN/WAN interfaces (iii) bank???s network to external network and interconnections
with partner, vendor and service provider networks are to be securely configured. |
|
25 |
| RMiT_v1.0 |
Appendix_5.6 |
RMiT_v1.0_Appendix_5.6 |
RMiT Appendix 5.6 |
Control Measures on Cybersecurity |
Control Measures on Cybersecurity - Appendix 5.6 |
Customer |
n/a |
Ensure security controls for remote access to server include the following:
(a) restrict access to only hardened and locked down end-point devices;
(b) use secure tunnels such as TLS and VPN IPSec;
(c) deploy ‘gateway’ server with adequate perimeter defences and protection such as firewall, IPS and antivirus; and
(d) close relevant ports immediately upon expiry of remote access. |
link |
19 |
| Sarbanes_Oxley_Act_(1)_2022_1 |
Sarbanes_Oxley_Act_(1)_2022_1 |
Sarbanes_Oxley_Act_(1)_2022_1 |
Sarbanes Oxley Act 2022 1 |
PUBLIC LAW |
Sarbanes Oxley Act 2022 (SOX) |
Shared |
n/a |
n/a |
|
92 |
| SOC_2023 |
A1.1 |
SOC_2023_A1.1 |
SOC 2023 A1.1 |
Additional Criteria for Availability |
Effectively manage capacity demand and facilitate the implementation of additional capacity as needed. |
Shared |
n/a |
The entity maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives. |
|
107 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC2.3 |
SOC_2023_CC2.3 |
SOC 2023 CC2.3 |
Information and Communication |
Facilitate effective internal communication. |
Shared |
n/a |
Entity to communicate with external parties regarding matters affecting the functioning of internal control. |
|
214 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC5.3 |
SOC_2023_CC5.3 |
SOC 2023 CC5.3 |
Control Activities |
Maintain alignment with organizational objectives and regulatory requirements. |
Shared |
n/a |
Entity deploys control activities through policies that establish what is expected and in procedures that put policies into action by establishing Policies and Procedures to Support Deployment of Management’s Directives, Responsibility and Accountability for Executing Policies and Procedures, perform tasks in a timely manner, taking corrective actions, perform using competent personnel and reassess policies and procedures. |
|
225 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC6.1 |
SOC_2023_CC6.1 |
SOC 2023 CC6.1 |
Logical and Physical Access Controls |
Mitigate security events and ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical information assets. |
Shared |
n/a |
Entity implements logical access security software, infrastructure, and architectures over protected information assets to protect them from security events to meet the entity's objectives by identifying and managing the inventory of information assets, restricting logical access, identification and authentication of users, consider network segmentation, manage points of access, restricting access of information assets, managing identification and authentication, managing credentials for infrastructure and software, using encryption to protect data and protect using encryption keys. |
|
127 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC6.2 |
SOC_2023_CC6.2 |
SOC 2023 CC6.2 |
Logical and Physical Access Controls |
Ensure effective access control and ensuring the security of the organization's systems and data. |
Shared |
n/a |
1. Prior to issuing system credentials and granting system access, the entity registers and authorizes new internal and external users whose access is administered by the entity.
2. For those users whose access is administered by the entity, user system credentials are removed when user access is no longer authorized. |
|
50 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC6.3 |
SOC_2023_CC6.3 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
56 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC6.7 |
SOC_2023_CC6.7 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
52 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC7.2 |
SOC_2023_CC7.2 |
SOC 2023 CC7.2 |
Systems Operations |
Maintain robust security measures and ensure operational resilience. |
Shared |
n/a |
The entity monitors system components and the operation of those components for anomalies that are indicative of malicious acts, natural disasters, and errors affecting the entity's ability to meet its objectives; anomalies are analysed to determine whether they represent security events. |
|
163 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC7.4 |
SOC_2023_CC7.4 |
SOC 2023 CC7.4 |
Systems Operations |
Effectively manage security incidents, minimize their impact, and protect assets, operations, and reputation. |
Shared |
n/a |
The entity responds to identified security incidents by:
a. Executing a defined incident-response program to understand, contain, remediate, and communicate security incidents by assigning roles and responsibilities;
b. Establishing procedures to contain security incidents;
c. Mitigating ongoing security incidents, End Threats Posed by Security Incidents;
d. Restoring operations;
e. Developing and Implementing Communication Protocols for Security Incidents;
f. Obtains Understanding of Nature of Incident and Determines Containment Strategy;
g. Remediation Identified Vulnerabilities;
h. Communicating Remediation Activities; and,
i. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Incident Response and periodic incident evaluations. |
|
209 |
| SOC_2023 |
CC8.1 |
SOC_2023_CC8.1 |
SOC 2023 CC8.1 |
Change Management |
Minimise risks, ensure quality, optimise efficiency, and enhance resilience in the face of change. |
Shared |
n/a |
The entity authorizes, designs, develops or acquires, configures, documents, tests, approves, and implements changes to infrastructure, data, software, and procedures to meet its objectives by Managing Changes Throughout the System Life Cycle, authorizing changes, designing and developing changes, documenting all changes, tracking system changes, configuring software's, testing system changes, approving system changes, deploying system changes, identifying and evaluating system changes, creating baseline configurations for IT technologies and providing necessary changes in emergency situations. |
|
143 |
| SOC_2023 |
PI1.3 |
SOC_2023_PI1.3 |
SOC 2023 PI1.3 |
Additional Criteria for Processing Integrity (Over the provision of services or the production, manufacturing, or distribution of goods) |
Enhance efficiency, accuracy, and compliance with organizational standards and regulatory requirements with regards to system processing to result in products, services, and reporting to meet the entity’s objectives. |
Shared |
n/a |
The entity implements policies and procedures over system processing to result in products, services, and reporting to meet the entity’s objectives. |
|
50 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_2024 |
1.1 |
SWIFT_CSCF_2024_1.1 |
SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 1.1 |
Physical and Environmental Security |
Swift Environment Protection |
Shared |
1. Segmentation between the user's Swift infrastructure and the larger enterprise network reduces the attack surface and has shown to be an effective way to defend against cyber-attacks that commonly involve a compromise of the general enterprise IT environment.
2. Effective segmentation includes network-level separation, access restrictions, and connectivity restrictions. |
To ensure the protection of the user’s Swift infrastructure from potentially compromised elements of the general IT environment and external environment. |
|
69 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_2024 |
1.2 |
SWIFT_CSCF_2024_1.2 |
SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 1.2 |
Privileged Account Control |
Operating System Privileged Account Control |
Shared |
Tightly protecting administrator-level accounts within the operating system reduces the opportunity for an attacker to use the privileges of the account as part of an attack (for example, executing commands or deleting evidence). |
To restrict and control the allocation and usage of administrator-level operating system accounts. |
|
53 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_2024 |
1.5 |
SWIFT_CSCF_2024_1.5 |
SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 1.5 |
Physical and Environmental Security |
Customer Environment Protection |
Shared |
1. Segmentation between the customer’s connectivity infrastructure and its larger enterprise network reduces the attack surface and has shown to be an effective way to defend against cyber-attacks that commonly involve compromise of the general enterprise IT environment.
2. Effective segmentation will include network-level separation, access restrictions, and connectivity restrictions. |
To ensure the protection of the customer’s connectivity infrastructure from external environment and potentially compromised elements of the general IT environment. |
|
57 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_2024 |
9.1 |
SWIFT_CSCF_2024_9.1 |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
57 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2021 |
6.3 |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2021_6.3 |
SWIFT CSCF v2021 6.3 |
Detect Anomalous Activity to Systems or Transaction Records |
Database Integrity |
|
n/a |
Ensure the integrity of the database records for the SWIFT messaging interface and act upon results |
link |
12 |
|
U.07.1 - Isolated |
U.07.1 - Isolated |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
62 |